this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
903 points (98.4% liked)

Comic Strips

22346 readers
1663 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

There are millionaires and billionaires in Europe though, so clearly it is possible to have decent work-life balance and still support the excesses of a rich upper class, assuming that's a requirement.

The amount of productivity lost because of paid leave is almost negligible, study after study has shown that people are less productive the more overworked they are. So staff with no time off work longer hours but are less productive for those hours, the end result is it pretty much equals out. If it didn't, the US economy would be doing better then it is, €1 is $1.16.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

The exchange rate isn't really the best indicator of the economy because either side can print more or take excess money out of circulation.

Not that your other points are wrong or anything. Just wanted to point that little thing out.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Studies show programmers are about as productive if they only work 80% compared to 100%. Or so I recall, gotta dig that one up. Personal experience is the more people linger in the office the less (quality) programming gets done.

My take is that people seem to like it, I mean why are they staying late for free otherwise?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah, it's a dumb reason to do anything, much less hand wealth to a bunch of people who don't give a shit about the workers who got them there. It was more tongue in cheek than anything.

Less time off has more to do with middle managers justifying their pittance than anything else.