Politics

11398 readers

16 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Tortilla, broccoli, ‘a piece of chicken’: US agriculture secretary mocked for ‘money-saving’ meal (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The US agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, is facing ridicule from congressional Democrats – among others – after claiming Americans can save money and have their meals align with new Department of Health and Human Services dietary guidelines by simply eating “a piece of chicken, a piece of broccoli”, “a corn tortilla” and “one other thing”.

One representative even called the remarks “a slap in the face to struggling working families”.

Rollins made the remarks during an interview with NewsNation in response to a question about how average Americans will afford adapting their meals to the White House’s updated food pyramid, which emphasizes red meat, full-fat dairy and saturated fats while discouraging ultra-processed foods and sugar. The rising cost of groceries has been a major issue for Americans in recent years.

So, the Columbo approach to meal planning. And I do love having a single spear of broccoli for garnish atop a corn tortilla.

ETA: The irony of saying immigrants are the problem and then suggesting tortillas is ... stunning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been eating a lot more grains and lentils and veggies and it's pretty cheap and nutritious. Meat is a luxury.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Grains, legumes, and veggies make a full balanced meal. Especially if it's whole grains. And it's affordable, too.

Meat is definitely a luxury, and it always was throughout history. Before industrial agriculture, besides rich people, most folks would only eat meat on feast days, and that would be on like a "kill a sheep, feed the whole village" type basis. It wasn't a staple.

People who insist that meat is necessary for complete nutrition need to get over the fact that they're just plain wrong.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For me, meat, cheese, fruit, grains(noodles), and nuts are my go-tos at the moment. Fruit is easy because it is its own packaging and generally doesn't require prep or refrigeration.

For whatever reason, my household seems short on veggies since I started packing lunches, and I need to do some expirimenting to figure out which work for me enough to buy more for myself rather than trying to stock the household with stuff the fams won't eat.

If anything's a luxury I don't expect to work-out for me soon, its fish.

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For sure. I usually eat salmon and it's now $15 for what used to be $8-$10

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You were eating cheap salmon!