Ask Canada

78 readers

11 users here now

🇨🇦 Welcome to Ask Canada

A place to ask real questions about Canadian culture, politics, history, geography, daily life, and everything in between.

If you’re curious about how this country works or want a Canadian perspective, you’re in the right place.

🎤 What You Can Post

Questions about Canada or Canadians
“How does this work?” and “Why is this a thing?”
Personal experiences, regional differences, and local knowledge
Serious questions, practical questions, weird questions
Light debate and thoughtful discussion

If you want Canadians to explain something ask it here.

🧭 Community Values

Discussion > Upvotes
We care about real conversation, not empty karma.

Respectful disagreement
Argue ideas, not people.

No partisan flamewars
Analysis, not tribalism.

Curiosity first
If someone asks a “basic” question, help them.

🛑 Not Allowed

Hate, harassment, racism
Spam
Low-effort troll questions
Nationalist / culture-war bait
Off-topic politics not tied to Canada

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

Yezzey@lemmy.ca

Trudeau built a pipeline to the West Coast. Now that Canada can sell oil to Asia, will Canadians benefit from owning it? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 week ago by Yezzey@lemmy.ca to c/AskCanada@lemmy.ca

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The federal government bought the Trans Mountain project, finished building it, and now owns the pipeline.

The case was that access to tidewater would reduce U.S. pricing power and open global markets like Asia. Now that the pipeline exists and Canada owns it, the question is simple.

Does public ownership mean Canadians benefit through toll revenue, better pricing leverage, and higher tax income? Or does it mainly mean the public took the risk while most of the upside still flows elsewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] running_ragged@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Generates revenue that will almost scratch the surface of what they spent to buy it and finish it.

And will continue to contribute to the climate change that is destroying Canadian towns and cities nearly every year that will need federal funding to help rebuild.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, to be on the hook for the cost and only have tax revenue from exports would be insane.

I think that's roughly why thier plan was to sell it. Build it, recoup the cost from the sale, and then from that net-zero position take additional revenue from exports (and all the peripheral benefits like the jobs it supports)

The other alternative would be to operate it and be collecting money from the actual use of the pipeline. That would have a much longer return on investment, and puts the government in the business of pipeline operation... which I don't think is appropriate for many reasons. Which is actually weird because I'm generally in favour of public ownership. But not for trans-provincial pipelines.