this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
594 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

78785 readers
2242 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lots of venture capital money behind it. I wonder how quickly the enshitification will begin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk -5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This is quite toxic attitude. You should focus on what's good for you - not what's bad for someone else.

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Monopolies are bad for everyone except their CEO and stockholders.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Eh, what's bad for capitalists is what's good for the rest of us

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't agree. We're not talking about a person or a charity. We're talking about a VC-backed company. They can fuck off and die, and it's not toxic – it's just common sense.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But two corporate entities competing are better than one secure in it's market share. Anyone with any sense would reject both for a fediverse option if it could be made to work well enough obviously but still.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

Only marginally... maybe. Duopolies are still really shitty for consumers and that's the best outcome to this. Significantly better would be if more people would realise what made internet amazing in the beginning and that logical consequences from that are that public spaces in the internet where the content comes from the people should be owned by the people.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

But competition IS good for me.

If people start migrating to better experience and better communities, they’re going to have to step up to stop the bleeding.

Reddit can get away with making terrible user experiences and killing 3rd party solutions because no alternative has lured enough of their base away.