this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
357 points (97.1% liked)

Lefty Memes

6677 readers
355 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Love my comrades cat-trans

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anarchists and communists can all agree, let’s burn this mother fucker down

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

we can agree that we should burn this mf down. we just disagree on what to build afterwards

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We can worry about that later, you got a lighter?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

it's just sad, that the moment we hang the last billionaire, us commies and anarchist will immediately become enemies. 😞

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah it would seem really counterproductive and a solution would be best. It would be cool to find compromise there but of course fascism has to dominate the conversation currently

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

that's the tragedy of Catalunya. on the civil war between Republican Catalunya and Fascist Spain, Catalunya had a minicivil war between the communists and anarchists.

they are a bit ideologically incompatible. both hate capitalism, so it makes sense that they are friends now, but one intendeds to replace capitalism with a proletariat state, and the other consideres states as intrinsically evil, regardless of capitalism.

I'll miss all my commie friends once the revolution comes 😔

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, you could just fuck off into the woods and visit when you want to, real commies won't hunt you. I think it's legit for people to want to live collectively under a state, and I think it's legit for people to want to be completely independent. Without the never ending appetite of capitalism, I think the two could coexist.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

interesting, the revolution isn't here and yet you preemptively exiled me from my community.

I think you have an ideological misconception.

anarchy isn't individualism. it is the opposite of individual independence. it's based on mutual aid, we help each other in a collective without a state that can legally kidnap, imprison, kill you whenever it deems convenient and will lash out at anything that will threaten the state.

it's the needless power structures that are intrinsically evil, racism, capitalism, sexism, state/people.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's just you looking to be butthurt. I'm saying that anarchists can go do their collective stuff and communists can go do their state stuff. You are viewing communism through the lenses of places that have pretended to be that way but were just using it as a disguise to exploit their workforce in a more extreme way than capitalism. There was no sharing of collective work in either the USSR or China. I personally think anarchy is for short sighted people who don't understand history. Good luck doing your non independent loving that will somehow never set up organizing structures to maximize efficiency.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It is still interesting, that you are already applying the state to punish dissenters while claiming to be different, even in this hypothetical, you prove the toxic concept of states. As you are sugar-coating exile and literally promoting a political purge with punishments so harsh most nations do not do that (so far only the US uses exiles as a punishment for some minorities).

Also keep in mind you are talking with your allied who will help you during the revolution. are going to build a world with them with the knowledge that you plan to stab them in the back?

I think you are confusing the Anarchist aesthetic, with Anarchist theory, they are so far apart.

Instead of using state violence to prove to every anarchist why states are evil, why not use your energy to build a state which anarchists wont complain, one that does not use violence on its people, a state that feeds everyone, a state where everyone is free.

Because those tools you build in your state to fight the enemy within, will be eventually used against you.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At no point did I mention state violence. My point was that I don't believe it would be a factor in an actual communist state. Could you highlight where you thought I was implying that?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

you did,

how do you expect to exile me? if I do not consent?

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At no point did I even hint at exiling anyone. With your victim complex I'm shocked you're not maga. Can you quote where I mentioned exiling anyone?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

is that you?

I mean, you could just fuck off into the woods and visit when you want to, real commies won't hunt you. I think it's legit for people to want to live collectively under a state, and I think it's legit for people to want to be completely independent. Without the never ending appetite of capitalism, I think the two could coexist.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/23793034

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Please explain how saying you can go live on your own and that no one would look for you, is a threat? I literally say the two could co exist. You seem like a sad person just looking to be angry.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

are gaslighting me? you literally just said that we can coexist as long as we are exiled, or in your words "fuck off".

that is not coexistance.

seriously, look inwardly because it seems that you only want a revolution to reproduce the means of oppression just with you at the top, rather than smashing the tools of oppression.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, you are the one who doesn't want to live in a place with an operating state government. Are you just offended by the word fuck? Capitalism has broken your brain if you truly don't believe there can be a governing body that can operate without oppression.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You set up a coercive government and tell everyone to obey or fuck off.

are you that daft?

you already starting your government with oppression. you're not giving it a good case. what if I want to stay in my community and we don't give a fuck about your government?

we won't follow your laws or report to it. what will your government do?

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why would we care? If you are stealing shit or harming people, that would be an issue, but that's also an issue for every society imagineable. Again, you can't see past what capitalism does and that's sad.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are the one who can't see what arbitrary hierarchies do, Capitalism is only one of them.

you just are saying that you aren't oppressive by saying "COMPLY OR ELSE".

you are the one who wants to replace capitalism with another form of tyranny.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where did I say comply or else? I said if you don't want to be a part of a community, you don't have to. Unless you go out completely on your own you will find yourself a part of a human made hierarchy, it's literally impossible not to.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ask Chiapas, Revolutionary Catalunya,or Rojava. it's only impossible because people like you want to be e able to control others because you think you better

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems like the only one doing that is you. It's like your brain is broken, all I've said is that I hope you can go do whatever you want. You keep insisting that you can't live alongside what I envision while pretending I'm the one being hostile. Truly, the last thing I would ever want to do is live near you.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You said that we do not belong on your society, and we should leave. that is a political cleansing. then you are trying to BS you did not say that.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You said you don't want to be a part of it, I said that's fine. You seem angry.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I said I don't want part of your system, not to be uprooted from my community because your system is forced on us. If you can't tell the difference you do not belong anywhere near power because you are literally advocating for political cleansing with propagandists words. If your system if forced upon everyone and their only solution is to exile them, You are not removing the means of oppression, just replacing them with your own, because it puts you on top.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is where you live connected to an electric grid, water, and roads? Who is going to maintain all of that for you? If you don't want the benefits of a shared society than you shouldn't be in one. It sounds like your a baby that wants everything but has no idea how they'll get it. I'm gonna guess you're between 14-22 and that your knowledge base is non-existent. Anarchists and libertarians are the same type of moron, all kinds of dreams, no answers regarding how they will work.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

are you confusing anarchism with primitivsm?

Anarchist states had electricity and services, without the risk of political cleansing or exile if they disagree with you.

I'm 38 in a local paxis action group/mutual aids, currently mass producing ICE whistles. not that it matters to you, given that you can't understand basic theory.

Stop yelling about your BS ideology and go help your neighbor.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Rojaba is not anarchist it's just non heirarchichal, it has a Federal Assembly and an Executive Council for decision making purposes. Communal non heirarchichal living is very possible in a communist framework. Way too assume that I'm not extremely active in my community. I'm 39, mass producing plastic trash is not the flex you think it is, maybe go do something that will actually help.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

funny how you accusing me of assuming you weren't helping your community, after my response from you accusing me of that. look at a mirror.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You definitely reminded that anarchists and libertarians are just silly people with no answers!

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

never met a commy that didn't do anything useful besides circle jerk.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As opposed to all of those famously effective anarchists.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yes? I'm active in a few mutual aids, feeding unhoused and whoever comes. we serve about 100 people twice a week. also organized drivers to bus unhoused in the winter from warmth shelters, as well as showing up at every town hall meeting to keep the mayor hostage, often till 1am with everyones mandated 4 minutes speeches, and blocked some acts.

and they do so much more, meanwhile the local DSA are twiddling their thumbs making fuckall.

if I have grievances agains white socialists cosplaying revolutionaries instead of doing actual praxis, it's from lived experience.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm guessing you live in Chicago or New York.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A medium sized town in the Midwest. so many people have been activated awekned lately. hope it's the same everywhere else.

I live in Asheville, so it's been pretty active for decades.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How do you defend yourself when a strong capitalist state sends its centralized military against your peaceful decentralized commune?

I agree 100% with your vision of how society could/should be organized, I just don’t see it as a practical first step in a world dominated by capital.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

please, go read some anarchist resources. because you are assuming anarchist are "peaceful" all my anarchist friends are armed and either have or are working on their open carry license.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That still doesn’t answer how groups of friends prevail against a centralized army with the industrial capacity of the world behind them.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

are you aware of the concept of "organizing"? we aren't a "group of friends" were a decentralized network with coalitions spanning multiple counties.

and you can see direct action in action. there are so many videos of ICE twats running from the public without taking whoever they were going to kidnap.

the Black Panthers are patrolling the streets with machine guns again.

you can just do stuff without permission from the state.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So it sounds like what you're describing is acts of resistance while living under the capitalist world order. What I'm talking about is what happens after a successful revolution and you are trying to maintain control in the face of capitalist wealth and power.

Obviously, yes, organize and form resistance coalitions and use direct action to stop the fascists. Revolution is not possible without all of that. But IMO neither is revolution possible solely through those things. By design, a decentralized network of coalitions is not as effective at wielding power as a centralized state, which is a serious handicap in a war.

Honestly though, I would have no qualms with adopting an anarchist strategy if it seriously seemed like the best approach given material conditions at the time. At all times, Power to the People.

The anarchists in Spain managed to fight Spain, until international support ended, except the Nazis didn't end support in violation of a treaty. resulting in Fascist Spain Spain having near unlimited support from Italy and Germany, and Catalunya getting fuck all. but before that happened, they managed to fight and resist.

each batallion was democratic, they voted on every military action, with the only rule is that there is no votes during active combat.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not inevitable, after all we want the same end result - a classless, stateless, moneyless society.

If it has truly gotten to the point where every last billionaire is gone, then I would argue that is pretty good evidence for the end of the hegemony of capital. I’m not sure that the material conditions of a world like that would require a dictatorship of the proletariat, and much more alignment with anarchists could be reached.

Of course, if we are talking about a more realistic scenario like a revolution in a single nation, then absolutely a central state is required to protect the revolution from reactionaries.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Chiapas did quite well, but they were too small to stand a chance, and Rojava is still going strong (as far as I'm aware, western media is intentionally hiding all news from Rojava), even though they are at war with a NATO state.

[–] irelephant@anarchist.nexus 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The situation for rojava isn't looking great right now.

yhea, but I'm willing to bet its for external reasons.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is this from a show or something? I've seen it before but always wondered.