this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
399 points (99.8% liked)

World News

51910 readers
2119 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greenland’s prime minister has said “we choose Denmark” before high-stakes talks at the White House as Donald Trump seeks to take control of the Arctic territory.

Amid rising tensions over the US president’s push, Jens-Frederik Nielsen on Tuesday told a joint press conference with his Danish counterpart, Mette Frederiksen, that the island would not be owned or governed by Washington.

“We are now facing a geopolitical crisis. If we have to choose between the US and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark, Nato and the EU,” Nielsen said, adding that the island’s “goal and desire is peaceful dialogue, with a focus on cooperation”.Trump’s pursuit of the island was also a matter of “international law and our right to our own country”, he said.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Get their european vassals back in line with a show of force.

I agree with the rest but at least Germany is covered and much of the rest of the EU. The politicians are pro US. There was no need for this conflict. It's unnecessary with huge risks.

It's also strange to imagine that all of the billionaires went along.

It doesn't add up for me. If the US take Greenland, Ukraine cannot be justified anymore. If Putin is making Trump do it then why should we support anything the US does? Taking Greenland costs Europe.

invading/couping anyone who dares to ally with China

On second thought, maybe that's it. Make the Europeans accept Greenland and everbody else falls in line.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I do agree that it is all very novel and weird. However, the show of force for European oligarchs is the most convincing reasoning to me.

From a purely financial standpoint it's a big investment with unclear returns. Natural resources there are difficult & expensive to extract (first of all, there's no infrastructure), expensive to transport, and it will take a very long time to recoup the costs of a full-blown invasion; neither fascists nor capitalists think on such timescales. In terms of projecting power on Russia, it's also dubious because US already has a military base in Greenland and could probably expand it quite a lot before Denmark would start seriously opposing it. And in any case I don't think Trump's admin is too worried about Russia at this point.

Meanwhile, European oligarchs are not happy about Trump trying to meddle directly on their political turf, supporting far-right parties and so on. As a result, EU is currently slowly distancing itself from US. There have been some mildly worded letters about the Gaza genocide and the Venezuela thing. EU is already trying to decouple from the US tech-wise, it has been trying to build its own defense pact, etc.

A drone strike campaign, Navy blockade, 1-day special forces operation to depose and kidnap the government, an amerikkan flag over Trumptown (previously known as Nuuk), and an island-sized military base with ICBMs 10 minutes away from any European capital sound like convincing arguments to stop even thinking about disobedience. It would also help with scaring everyone else too - as a russian saying goes - beat up your friends to instill fear in your enemies. Again, I'm not sure this is how it would work out were it to happen, but the fascists tend to think this way.

To me it feels like the least improbable of all reasons.

Of course it's also possible that this is just Trump and Miller blabbering about their wet dreams and the oligarchs won't let them do it.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 8 hours ago

With Blackrock the US are also the European Oligarchs. Which European Oligarchs are opposing the US?

The craziest explanation that I have seen is the following. With Venezuela, It sounds almost reasonable, especially since Trump said that it makes him feel better:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy_movement#The_technate