this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
371 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27131 readers
3071 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The murder of Renee Nicole Good by ICE officer Jonathan Ross has certainly created quite the divide between the reality-based majority of the population who doesn’t want masked unaccountable federal law enforcement goons invading cities they have no business being in and shooting people for saying “dude, I’m not mad at you” and trying to drive away… and the fantasy-land MAGA folks who are bending over backwards to justify the murder.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm kinda out of the loop here. Is the officer (piece of shit) under investigation and suspended or is he on the street with a gun?

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The federal government is claiming the FBI has exclusive jurisdiction over the investigation in an attempt to prevent Minnesota from trying him on state charges, while also trying to paint Renée Good as a subversive extremist as a retroactive justification for the murderer's actions.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 38 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Either way, he killed a person. I don't know how it's in the US, but shouldn't he be suspended until the court decides he's innocent and after undergoing psychological evaluation?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In the US we give them a pat on the back, reload their gun, and throw them back on the streets.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good luck with that. Even in Russia, an officer is suspended after killing a person. I guess it compensates court corruption but what do I know

[–] moody@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago

For the police, typically they would be suspended while the case is reviewed.

With these guys, apparently they declare them not guilty on the spot and let tgem carry on shooting civilians.

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

ICE don't seem to have any oversight. If Ross were suspended the public has no way of knowing.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the head of the FBI is a political appointment, making the FBI and Department of Justice under the current administration more tools for selective, partisan legal enforcement than actual justice. Given that the FBI is currently trying to claim Good was an activist, rather than determining whether her civil rights were violated, it currently seems unlikely that Jonathan Ross will be convicted. It's an investigation looking to paint Ross as the victim from the start.

Unless Minnesota can obtain access to the evidence and try him on their own, the only hope would be for a conviction under a non-Republican administration, assuming Ross isn't pardoned of federal charges by that point, and that the FBI hasn't tampered with the evidence in the meantime.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the detailed response! So Ross doesn't even have the status of a suspect, which is common in the US

[–] Red_October@piefed.world 6 points 1 day ago

Well he was acting under the authority of a regime that is actively looking for an excuse to deploy the military against it's own citizens and fetishizes murdering their political opponents. In a sane world he would at a minimum be suspended pending an investigation, but instead the fuhrer will try to get out of any possible charges and probably give the fucker a medal.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Good psych evaluation is exactly what got him this job in the first place. They want the crazies with no regard for life.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

but shouldn’t

We've been saying this broadly for a few years. What should be is not happening broadly. This country is going down in flames.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fascist officer is still out on the streets working as well as having a GiveSendGo (GoFundMe for fascists) for 6 figures.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

He also has a GoFundMe apparently, against their TOS but last I heard they did not care

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

At least his victim's gofundme hit multiple 7-figures.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe that they gave him a medal and his pick of the detained women.

In his choice of porta-potty.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On the street planning to do it again.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Well that'd be the worst possible outcome.

Shit even paid leave while he pretends to go through some counseling would be better than that.