this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
77 points (98.7% liked)

Slop.

763 readers
560 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So what’s going on here, most likely, is that the intake of new users is declining as opposed to people specifically being driven off the platform (as some users allege).

The difference, one would assume, is that on the whole, Reddit’s political biases influence more what is not shown (much like lemmy.ml banning people for any criticism of Russia, China, or North Korea, or the echo chamber in hexbear), whereas Lemmy’s tankie issue also manifests as people actively sea-lioning (e.g. Cowbee) and (especially from hexbear) overt trolling, which shows up more in people’s faces. Both are issues, neither are good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

such as not displaying replies publicly if a blocked user replies to someone

This is slightly wrong, it's not that it doesn't display it, it's that it completely drops the comment. The comment is never added to the instance's database. It also is never federated, which I believe has the result that if you are talking on a community on the same instance as the blocker, the comment never makes it to other instances.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, so it's even more abusable than I thought!

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yup. Of course, replies to that reply will also never show up. So this is one of the reasons I wouldn't use piefed, if user A has blocked user B or instance B, you won't see the reply from user B or instance B and replies to that reply (regardless of who or from where). So there can be an entire interesting discussion being had that you as a user on some piefed instance cannot see, not because you blocked someone or an instance but because someone else did.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yep, it's a really short-sighted decision with major ramifications that is entirely the product of the type of McCarthyites that would make their own Lemmy alternative just to curb communist influence. I was even considering proposing a PieFed commie instance to keep that connection going and increase exposure, but this seems like it wouldn't work at the moment.

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Did you know, attempting to upload an image with "Anonymous" and ("No." or " N0") can^[1]^ decrease your "reputation"^[2]^ and you might^[1]^ be denied that upload, with as the code itself states: "deliberately misleading error message". Source

^1^: If the text check hasn't been disabled by the admin of your instance.
^2^: Literally Social Credit Score.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Incredible, every accusation is truly a confession.

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

And hey, if your reputation is severely bad (<-10) you cannot downvote

We had a code review yesteday, and this is only half of what we found.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] I_Hate_AmeriKKKa@hexbear.net 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

are you planning on making a post about what you've found?

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 5 points 19 hours ago

I did think about it yesterday but haven't chosen to do so yet.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago

I'm kinda surprised by just how bad it is, this is almost comically on the nose.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

If your comment ~~is nothing but~~ starts wtih a link to a gif reaction it will decrease your reputation and not accept the comment

Just a line below that if your reply_is_stupid it won't accept it either.

If your account is created_very_recently and the reply contains an em dash (—) it sends a notification to the admins

If your attitude is < 0.0 you cannot downvote either. Attitude is as the code says: "(upvotes cast - downvotes cast) / (upvotes + downvotes). A number between 1 and -1 is the ratio between up and down votes they cast"

If your reputation is <= -10 you cannot create new chats.

If your account has less than 100 reputation you are not considered trustworthy (what things you can do when you are trustworthy I don't know, but again literally social credit score)

If you have 0 posts, 0 replies, and your username is specifically 8 characters long, you cannot vote

Mods can kick you from a community which unsubscribes you from that community


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So much for supposedly having more free speech than us.

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Something I didn't see in yesterdays code review.

if your reply contains a blocked_phrase, it won't accept the comment.

Seems like Lemmy's slur filter, but worse in that it just won't accept the comment (and I think that all of these things I have linked to in PostReply.new() where it won't accept a comment, results in federated comments... just never showing up on a piefed instance)


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm guessing this probably blocks any hint of not libaral-establishment-approved sentence too? Do you know what's in their block list?

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 10 points 1 day ago

No, it's set by the admins


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.