this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
511 points (98.1% liked)

News

34111 readers
4381 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The judge cited the Supreme Court's recent decision establishing parents' right to opt kids out of LGBTQ+ inclusive lessons.

A Boston judge has ruled in favor of a Massachusetts dad who sued his local school district to ensure his five-year-old son is never exposed to books featuring LGBTQ+ characters.

As the Boston Herald reported, the father, identified in court documents as Alan L., is described as a “devout Christian” who objects to the inclusion of certain children’s books featuring LGBTQ+ characters in the kindergarten curriculum of Joseph Estabrook Elementary School, where his son, identified as J.L., is enrolled.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You realize they don't really care? They just do it to exert control over public institutions. It's a way of threatening and eventually firing progressive teachers. Majority of those court cases are manufactured by right-wing think tanks and the parents are just some random people. In many cases the "victims" suing were not even real. It doesn't matter. The Supreme Court will eventually take the case and give Christians another win.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The politicians who confect the controversy may do it for that reason, but you're making a mistake if you think the ordinary believers are anything but sincere in their beliefs.

How do they square it then? Well, that's easy: they themselves weren't really exposed to gay people growing up and they turned out just fine - they hate gay people, just like God intended.

I honestly think that people following this line of people just really can't imagine that people are that prejudiced, but they do be like that.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They sure are homophobic but they don't normally sue schools to shield their children from LGBT books just like they don't normally go to court to let them discriminate gay couples in their bakery. Lawsuits like that cost money. If you appeal and appeal up to the Supreme Court it costs serious money. These lawsuits are politically motivated hit jobs sponsored but right wing donors and executed by right wing think tanks. People really need to realize this is how they operate now. Those are not some grassroots movements or random Christians trying to "protect" their kids. Those are all well prepared, targeted actions, sometimes planned and executed over many years. This is how they overturned Roe v. Wade, this is how they took control over public libraries and this is how they will take over education.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think "most people don't have a billion dollars to use the US court system" says much about what they'd do if they did have a billion dollars.

Yeah, the money to fight it may be donated by people with ulterior motives - or it may be donated by a million true believers - but that doesn't change that there are true believers, and trying to pretend they don't exist will lead you to say stupid things and fight back in the wrong way.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying no one rally believes this shit. I'm saying believers are not the real problem. How would you fight believers? Ban religion? The problem are the corrupt institutions and weak laws. The solution is to pass laws that actually protect people. Roe v. Wade wasn't abolished because people started believing harder. Support for abortion is actually fairly stable and grew in recent decade. What changed is that Republicans took over the Supreme Court and cooked a state level lawsuit that let them abolish it. All those cases are like that. Getting mad at "true believers" will lead you to nowhere. You should be mad at Democrats for failing to pass laws on federal level when they had the chance.