this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
115 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

14284 readers
133 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If it cant work why does it work and did even better in the past before for example germany destroyed a lot of its rail-network

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It really is not though. Compared to 1994 there are 50% more passengers and 90% more freight being transported. The main issue is that the network is massivly over capacity and needs to be upgraded. However it is hardly destroyed.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, neglected would be the better word. I think the software in some trains is actually from 93-94. During this time period of increased demand they just let it run with bare minimum maintenance.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Software? You mean the 100 years old manual switches? That's the actual reality of the rail network. The trains aren't the problem.

[–] Vrtrx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Train software doesn't mean anything though? It doesn't matter if it uses Windows 95 or even older. It needs to work reliably, all required software needs to run on it and that's it. It's like complaining your plane doesn't run on Windows 11

[–] UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would not want my plane to run on Windows 11, that would be terrifying.

Edit: he -> be

[–] Vrtrx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

What do you mean? It comes with Copilot. Is there anything better than a plane with Copilot?

/s

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago

A lot of lines have been permanently decommissioned, especially in the area of local transport. They are now unusuable. To call that "destruction" is fitting.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

Replacing a train stop in one city with a bus to another city in the opposite direction an hour away to get on a train to go back in the first direction is destroying the rail network.

Yeah, but the Autolobby is in the government...

Probably witches!