this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
539 points (96.9% liked)

Games

22748 readers
708 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
539
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney argues banning Twitter over its ability to AI-generate pornographic images of minors is just 'gatekeepers' attempting to 'censor all of their political opponents' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 day ago by RetroGoblet79@eviltoast.org to c/games@sh.itjust.works
214 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, it certainly comes across as you arguing for the opposite since you above, reiterated

The real thing to talk about is the presence or absence of a victim.

Which has never been an issue. It has never mattered in CSAM if it's fictional or not. It's the depiction that is illegal.

[–] dantel@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

Is it so hard to admit that you misunderstood the comment ffs? It is painfully obvious to everyone.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, it certainly comes across as you arguing for the opposite

No, it does not. Stop being a liar.

Or, even better: do yourself a favour and go offline. Permanently. There's already enough muppets like you: assumptive pieces of shit lacking basic reading comprehension, but still eager to screech at others — not because of what the others actually said, but because of what they assumed over it. You're dead weight in any serious discussion, probably in some unserious ones too, and odds are you know it.

Also, I'm not wasting my time further with you, go be functionally illiterate elsewhere.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago

Ok. You're right. You saying it's ok to depict CSAM if there isn't a victim is not you arguing the opposite. It's me lying.

You're so smart. Good job.