771

China has lashed out at Germany after its foreign minister called Xi Jinping a “dictator” and summoned Berlin’s ambassador for a dressing down, in the latest flaring of tensions with a western democratic power over how the Chinese leader is described overseas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Most dictators haven't gone by that term, preferring instead some other executive role like chairman, supreme leader, or president. If Xi doesn't want to be called a dictator, maybe China should start holding open elections, see how popular the CCP really is.

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 year ago

The CCP has higher approval rates than western governments and the vast majority of Chinese believe they are living in a democracy. This is confirmed by western studies; latest one I've seen was from Harvard.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Belief can be a helpful thing

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

the vast majority of Chinese believe they are living in a democracy.

So do the vast majority of Americans.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Okay but what meaningful influence does the average Chinese person have on who is chosen as Paramount Leader.

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Enough for them to believe that they live in a democracy, it seems (and I don't say that sarcastically).

It's not like people in liberal democracies have more influence. We can't choose who runs, and each individual's vote is negligible. I don't know the specifics of China's government, but I suspect they value being able to influence local policy and higher official elections via the Communist Party more than a direct vote on its leader -- I would too, honestly.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

A fair bit, actually. China's political system is basically a popularity system from bottom to top. At the lowest level, politicians only stay in power if their population is happy. This trickles up to the provincial level, where politicians again only stay in power if their population is happy. At a national level, the national leaders stay in power by building, essentially, large cabinets out of different provincial and regional leaders - thus, their entire position relies on keeping the provinces happy.

It's not the perfect system, but Chinese citizens can fairly easily impact local and even provincial policy and, by extension, influence national policy (recently, by repealing the COVID lockdowns with mass protests).

The CCP isn't an absolute monarchy or something. At the end of the day, it serves it's people. The power of the Chinese economy is in its industrial capacity, after all, not in its wealth: the needs of the people need to be addressed to keep the country stable.

[-] CohortCzort@lemmygrad.ml -5 points 1 year ago

The same as the average western person.. So probably very little.

don't make conflations with the USA and other liberal democracies. There are plenty of transparent, effective democracies where popular votes matter massively, and saying because the USA is electorally broken that everywhere is only serves the narrative that true liberal democracy "isn't possible" i.e., exactly what China and Russia suggest.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago

The CCP does not have confidence in that though, hence the way it runs the elections there.

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'd say that it has confidence in that, but their elections and government are structured in a different way.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Just like Ford sold their cars in any colour you want, so long as it is black.

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

If 95% of ford owners were satisfied with their black cars, vs 40% for another manufacturer that provides cars in multiple colors, then ford would be the better manufacturer.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Most forced elections haven't gone by that term, preferring instead some other description like people's elections, free elections, or secured elections. Made up words but you get the idea.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Most dictators haven't gone by that term, preferring instead some other executive role like chairman, supreme leader, or president.

Don't forget Führer

[-] clutch@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

Open elections when there is only one party in practice are moot

[-] float@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Tbh, with only two it's not too much better either.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
771 points (94.4% liked)

World News

32518 readers
720 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS