this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
424 points (99.5% liked)

News

34203 readers
3048 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas officials have turned over the state’s voter roll to the U.S. Justice Department, according to a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, complying with the Trump administration’s demands for access to data on millions of voters across the country.

The Justice Department last fall began asking all 50 states for their voter rolls — massive lists containing significant identifying information on every registered voter in each state — and other election-related data. The Justice Department has said the effort is central to its mission of enforcing election law requiring states to regularly maintain voter lists by searching for and removing ineligible voters.

Alicia Pierce, a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, told Votebeat and The Texas Tribune that the state had sent its voter roll, which includes information on the approximately 18.4 million voters registered in Texas, to the Justice Department on Dec. 23.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yes totally not sensitive at all. Not like you live in the address provided and this administration has a bone to pick with those that don’t register as the GOP.

Also property records are not “very public.” Yes you are able to request the information, but there is anything suspicious about the request the records holder can and should block said request.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes totally not sensitive at all. Not like you live in the address provided and this administration has a bone to pick with those that don’t register as the GOP.

The current situation doesn't retroactively somehow make these records sensitive.

Also property records are not “very public.” Yes you are able to request the information, but there is anything suspicious about the request the records holder can and should block said request.

Not in my (most?) states. Property records are readily accessible online for the states I've had to look up. I can pull up a property on a map and find full history of sales, purchases, owners, permits, renovations, and more. Also why it's used often in OSINT.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Indeed it doesn’t. It’s an example of a situation that could happen if the records were genuine everyday public knowledge.

Indeed you can, and said look ups only give you partial information, and even then a suspicious lookup and you get blocked out. With VPNs and non-US IPs blocked by default.

And even then you are needing to go to multiple sites to get a profile. The Voting Rolls however is a complete profile, thus they are not made to be public

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Indeed you can, and said look ups only give you partial information, and even then a suspicious lookup and you get blocked out. With VPNs and non-US IPs blocked by default.

You made multiple claims about how it's not "very public" and somehow that the property owner can somehow block requests which is just nonsense. And now you've changed to arguing that it's public but somehow restricted by location or whatever. Or maybe you've run into scraping protections before and somehow you think that supports your idea that this information is not public. At best maybe you're referencing a state that has these protections, but it's absolutely not commonplace. I think you're just full of shit, though.

And even then you are needing to go to multiple sites to get a profile. The Voting Rolls however is a complete profile, thus they are not made to be public

What?

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except I didn’t say Property owners can block. I said record holders. IE, the different government departments that maintain and keep track of the documents.

I didn’t Change though, being able to make a records request doesn’t mean therefore the information is Public, particularly at the level you imply (a simple ass Google search.).

It is common place though.

“Excuse me property value evaluation office can you give me a complete stranger provide the home addresses of homes with families.”

“Sorry stranger we have no knowledge who you are and the IP address your email request appears to be from Ukraine. Your request is denied to protect the property owners from being victims.”

The local county department that tracks property only knows the property and who gets taxed for owning said property.

Meanwhile the voting rolls has ones Legal Name, Address they live in, Social Security Number.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn’t Change though, being able to make a records request doesn’t mean therefore the information is Public, particularly at the level you imply (a simple ass Google search.).

It's public. Live. With GIS data maps of property boundaries. Available to anyone at any time. I can give you actual links or you could just do some simple ass Google searches as you said. Quit making shit up.

“Sorry stranger we have no knowledge who you are and the IP address your email request appears to be from Ukraine. Your request is denied to protect the property owners from being victims.”

haha

The local county department that tracks property only knows the property and who gets taxed for owning said property.

Also completely and entirely false.

Meanwhile the voting rolls has ones Legal Name, Address they live in, Social Security Number.

Also false. I doubt you've even registered to vote anywhere in this country.

Keep replying with more completely made up bullshit.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago

Yes there are GIS maps of properties but all those tell you is the property and who owns the property. So unless you actively live in the property it’s not exactly someone finding you via Google.

Registered and voted in Illinois. Each time I decided to take part in the primary I am asked which party ballot. From there I am registered as a Democrat because I voted in the Democratic Primary.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Property records in most states and counties have a web portal with a search bar. You input the address and you can get the name of who lives there. The opposite is true in some places as well, you input the name and get the address. It's not good, don't get me wrong, but it is "very public" in most places.

Luckily, my state doesn't have you register your political affiliation. That's what is most worrying about Texas doing this, since they do have you pick a primary. Otherwise, it is basically just public records.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago

Nope what you get is who owns the property. It’s certainly possible the homeowner lives there (obviously.) but if a property is say a Rental, then the information is going to be the Land Lord.

Actually unless the State has a Jungle Primary or just a general election you are going to have a party affiliation. Literally speaking from a State that is Open Primary so the rolls register based on which primary I vote in.