this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
249 points (99.6% liked)

History Memes

1328 readers
957 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Try Marxist-Leninists. I literally had this exact conversation the other day with two .ml users... They were trying to claim communism "actually totally works" because Russia/China/etcetc have proven it ... except they're not communist countries. They then went on to explain that, "no aktually having a ruling party that continues to segregate the population and elevate and protect their own positions is totally communism! You need to read more theory, because there has to be a transition to communism ..."

blah blah blah... They're literally too stupid to understand OP's joke. They unironically think that stuff.

[–] arcticx@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The withering of the state as a concept is a foundational part of ML theory and it does seem as though you’re being intentionally obtuse. I don’t think you would run into a ton of people who believe that OPs meme is an implausible situation as this is the exact reason continuous revolution exists as a concept. The transitional state has to be scrutinized so as not to become a tool of bourgeois capitalism once more.

So yeah to echo what the others said to you: you should read more theory. Your understanding of these concepts seems to be more memetic than anything.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

lol No, my understanding is not lacking. I know what ML prescribes and imagines. I disagree it's such a hopeful premise IRL.

It's also stupid to call any transitionary period 'communism' itself, either, much like supposedly China today.