this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
232 points (98.7% liked)
Progressive Politics
3646 readers
551 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
you don't need authority to allow something to happen or approve of a source of action, but I'll concede that "allow" implies inapplicable idling. I really can't think of other ways to convey that the construction would cut West Bank in half and either that a government "tender, which seeks bids from developers, would clear the way to begin construction of the E1 project" or "Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations." I can't say "advances plan" either because they're opening up submissions for plans.
FWIW I would endorse "approve" in your gas station example.
edit: had→gas