this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
578 points (98.8% liked)

Greentext

7572 readers
588 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/28115777

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Assuming the cops are dumb (enough) is a really risky strategy.

I am not saying to assume that they're dumb. I'm saying to assume that they're malicious

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is a much safer assumption. Assume they are both malicious and smart. If they aren't, you haven't lost anything (except for the very small chance to get away with something, but if you rely on the cops being benevolent and/or dumb, maybe overthink your whole plan).

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. Assuming they're smart isn't necessary, nor is it realistic.

All you need to assume is that they're malicious. They are rewarded for fucking people over. That's all that matters

Now grow up and quit insisting on having the last word in the argument as if that makes you right

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Nice bait: do I take it, and therefore lose, or do I not, and therefore let you have the last word?

Eh, we all know it. I am right, since I have the last word. I work at a pretty slow job, I have unlimited coffee and time, try me.