this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
580 points (98.8% liked)
Greentext
7572 readers
585 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Assuming the cops are dumb (enough) is a really risky strategy. And even if you are lucky and they are, they might just end up making a lucky guess.
Plus, they've been through this game hundreds of times, while you most likely have quite limited experience with the system (hopefully). Never underestimate that.
I am not saying to assume that they're dumb. I'm saying to assume that they're malicious
That is a much safer assumption. Assume they are both malicious and smart. If they aren't, you haven't lost anything (except for the very small chance to get away with something, but if you rely on the cops being benevolent and/or dumb, maybe overthink your whole plan).
No. Assuming they're smart isn't necessary, nor is it realistic.
All you need to assume is that they're malicious. They are rewarded for fucking people over. That's all that matters
Now grow up and quit insisting on having the last word in the argument as if that makes you right
Nice bait: do I take it, and therefore lose, or do I not, and therefore let you have the last word?
Eh, we all know it. I am right, since I have the last word. I work at a pretty slow job, I have unlimited coffee and time, try me.