this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
106 points (95.7% liked)
World News
38744 readers
206 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, yeah. But one doesn't cancel the other.
EDIT: This is nothing more than whataboutism. "What about Trump?" Yeah I know Trump is a garbage of a human being. If you can even all him human at this point. Him, the people around him and the entire American government have done so much harm to humanity. They're worst only next to Israel, whose people make the worst fictional monsters look like little ballerinas.
But that doesn't cancel the fact Maduro was an asshole corrupt crooked motherfucker who inflicted a lot of pain on the people of his country.
Do I condone him being kidnapped like this? Hell no. That's bullshit. America can fuck off.
you're the one doing whataboutism bringing up that "maduro is not innocent" come on.
I'm not trying to cancel anything about Maduro. I'm highlighting the parallels between him and the wealthy, corrupt, convicted felon in charge of the US.
Well we all know about the US gouvernent and their crimes.
But why can't anybody here acknowledge that Maduro was a crook himself? He had to go, but he rigged the system against it.
I mean if we were talking about Chavez, that guy had his people's well being at heart. And I have a lot of respect for that man.
But Maduro I can't defend. And it seems to me like the people here are defending him, and argue and downvote in bad faith. If a leader is a bad person, no matter where they stand on the political spectrum, they shouldn't be defended from any criticism.
Election fraud goes unpunished all over the world. I'm not defending Maduro, but he was arrested for narco-terrorism, not system rigging.
The initial comment I made was that his election being fair and democratic was debatable, which is true. Then everybody went apeshit trying to defend him with whataboutisms. That's the problem.
I didn't really have a problem with your description. I just thought it was so close to describing Trump that it needed highlighting.
"It doesn't change the fact that [Trump] was corrupt and was living in luxury and was well fed while [Americans] were hungry and poor."
Well we're on the same page. I don't know about the others.