this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
1004 points (99.1% liked)

World News

51846 readers
2308 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing cannot accept any country acting as the "world's judge" after the United States captured Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro.

The world's second-largest economy has provided Venezuela with an economic lifeline since the U.S. and its allies ramped up sanctions in 2017, purchasing roughly $1.6 billion worth of goods in 2024, the most recent full-year data available.

Almost half of China's purchases were crude oil, customs data shows, while its state-owned oil giants had invested around $4.6 billion in Venezuela by 2018, according to data from the American Enterprise Institute think tank, which tracks Chinese overseas corporate investment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Three what now? Do you mean three modules for one station? Or three consecutive stations, one testing technology for the next? E.g. a short time station, e.g. a crew vehicle? I am only aware of one station, Tiangong. Do I have to do another web search? :(

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's just the one.

It can only house three people.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that is what I thought. Still, I was impressed when they launched it as announced.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He may have meant one space station and some extra moon missions or something? They have been popping off a fair bit.

Honestly, I don't care what country dominates and wins the space race, i will just be impressed that we don't kill each other trying.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would prefer for it to be an international cooperation - but we're just fucking this up big time :/

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

I feel like that astronaut 'always-has-been' meme would drop pretty hard right now

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The current monster they have completed in 2022, Tiangong, was the third in a series of stations, the previous Tiangong-1 and Tiangong-2 stations were mostly meant to test technique and technology but were remarkable achievements in their own right. They currently have the largest and most active space program in the world. I didn't even touch on their lunar program, their heavy satellite capability and their list of recent and upcoming solar-system probes.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
  1. I don't think monster is an appropriate word for a space station.
  2. so yeah, Tiangong-1 & -2 were single vehicle modules for technology evaluation. Similar to Skylab in concept (single launch, test docking technologies & crewed missions)
  3. as impressive as the Chinese space program is, the ISS is substantially bigger. Sadly, the world has not gotten their shit together in time for a follow-up station, and Gateway is pretty much dead-at-conception.
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh the ISS is definitely bigger than anything ever sent to space, as I would expect from an international project that was built by a coalition of countries in better days, but it doesn't really compare to China's long-term goals and plans that have been on schedule. China is absolutely dominating space right now and will be into the future unless the US just suddenly gets it shit together and elects people who care about science and exploration, and even then it will take many years or decades now to undo the damage that trumpism has done to the US's global leadership in space science.

The ISS is going to be deorbited in 2031, and I am not expecting a bigger, newer project to replace it. At this point I am not expecting to have access to health care broadly in 2031 in the US.

No argument there. China definitely has the better and more advanced space program. The ISS might get extended again if it doesn't break and once people realize there is nothing comparable ready by 2030/31, but yes, eventually, there will be no international nor western space station in orbit for the foreseeable future.