this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
540 points (92.1% liked)

linuxmemes

22141 readers
1399 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Language/ัะทั‹ะบ/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • ย 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] cley_faye@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're aware that Electron app have access to much more stuff than what you can do in a browser? Like, important, functional stuff?

    Getting really tired of "this is just a website" approach. It's starting to feel like /r/programmerhumor here.

    just because electron apps have access to system features that browsers restrict access to for security reasons doesn't mean they're not websites in a trenchcoat

    [โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Are you aware that a huge chunk, most likely the vast majority, of Electron apps don't use all that and are just wrapped web sites?

    [โ€“] inge@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    a huge chunk, most likely the vast majority, of Electron apps [...] are just wrapped web sites

    [citation needed]

    [โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [โ€“] BlueBockser@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    If the question was "how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron", your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

    [โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    If the question was โ€œhow many repositories on GitHub mention the word electronโ€, your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

    That is a valid citation. You can count yourself how many of those repositories are just for wrapping specific websites by random people. If you think I'm wrong, put your money where your mouth is and provide a citation yourself.

    [โ€“] BlueBockser@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source. If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I'm gonna assume it to be false.

    [โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source.

    Your laziness to count repos is not my fault. ๐Ÿคท

    If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, Iโ€™m gonna assume it to be false.

    OK, then I'm continuing to assume your statements are false because you can't even be bothered to provide a citation why mine is not valid. Bye then.