this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
399 points (94.0% liked)

World News

51806 readers
1318 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thoughts?

Is this imperialism by China, a country which is supposed to be left-wing? Leftists are normally anti-imperialism. Wouldn't it be better to let Taiwan democratically decide whether they want to be part of China or not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Winning an election in Taiwan doesn't give them a claim to mainland China. This isn't relevant.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And not winning any elections doesn't give Xi Jinping any claim to mainland China either.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Winning the civil war and controlling the land does.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Being a conqueror doesn't give you a legitimate claim to anything. We decided a century ago to leave that Imperialism bullshit in the past but I guess some people can't let it go.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What we as we want and what is real are two different things. We do business and perform politics with many authoritarians and will continue with no end in sight. Some of us live in reality.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We do business and perform politics with many authoritarians

And that's exactly why the world can't have nice things.

I'm finding it difficult to continue because you've abandoned political analysis for moral truisms. We began by discussing the objective sources of legitimacy and statehood, but you’ve retreated into a 'Gish Gallop' of emotional appeals.

Whether or not you like a regime's methods doesn't change the reality of its statehood or its control over a territory. Since you’re no longer engaging with the central argument of how states actually function in reality, there’s nowhere left for this conversation to go.