this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
382 points (99.5% liked)

World News

51996 readers
3508 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is a very unusual way to look at history. You have to look at geopolitical decisions based on where the pieces are on the board today, not 30 years ago. The US was a unipolar hegimon 30 years ago. That is not the case today. There was no need leverage their hard power this way at that time. But circumstances are different now.

Trump and his administration may have accelerated the transition to a multipolar world order but the rise of China alone meant it was coming regardless of US foreign policy action.

My argument is that this has been in the back pocket and, if/when the time came, it would have been executed regardless of who was president. Its a particularly easy one to execute since, as you've said, there are questions to the legitimacy of Maduro as leader so they can replay the go to narrative of being liberators.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess it's a lot easier to "look at history" a certain way if you make up the history.

I have too much to do today to deliberate the specifics of your historical fan fiction, man. You do you.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Fair. My overall impression is you're coming at this from an American viewpoint so there is a natural predisposition to want to tell yourself that choice, via elections, makes a difference. Coming from a non American, non Western perspective there really is very little if any consideration given towards who is in power from this vantage point. There's an understanding that America will intervene for its within its national interests. The process may differ but the outcome is the same. Our goal is generally to avoid being in the crosshairs of empire, if at all possible (while also protecting our interests).

I respect your opinion even though I find it a bit narrow in focus and perspective (as I'm sure you have similar criticisms of mine). In any case thanks for the discourse.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For the record, I'm not American and I live in a country that has non-democratic regimes well within living memory.

You don't come across to me as particularly savvy, or as some form of a realist compared to the cushy liberal democracy children. You come across as deeply confusing cynicism with political insight for online brownie points.

Do with that assessment what you will.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I dont see either of us as uniquely savvy or insightful so at least we have that in common haha. Have a good one bud.