0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 104 points 1 year ago

He had to disregard all four rules of firearms at once to pull this one off.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

Ah but you see, none of those rules individually can prevent all negligent discharges, so following any of them is definitionally nonsensical. What? Why yes I do be snorting Ivermectin

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago

rule 5 of firearm safety: abolish the police

[-] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Remember when libs defended Alec Baldwin from this kind of shit?

They are so against guns, but the second someone who was mean to trump breaks all the rules, it's suddenly an accident.

I'm half expecting libs to start siding with the cops in these situations now for the same reasons.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Libs don't know there even are rules of firearm safety.

[-] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

When pressed, they sure don't know what any of them are.

"You gotta break the gun down when you're not target shooting and bag each piece and sink it in the bottom of a different lake!"

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

I am shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you, that an ex-cop thinks rules don't apply to them

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago