this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
500 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

8894 readers
1334 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago (5 children)
[–] derry@midwest.social 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Except for the bootleggers and speakeasies, wink wink.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but lack of access actually did reduce general consumption. The average person doesn't drink more during prohibition.

[–] derry@midwest.social 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. And the average person doesn't drink 4 long island ice teas at outback. Lol

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Right, the average person's just there for a Bloomin' Onion and a Half Rack

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lack of access only reduced consumption among those who lost access. For those who were consuming bootleg their consumption increased. Often to harder liqours for obvious reasons.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah. That's the point. Reducing access has an effect. That's basic basic economics. So is the expectation that forbidding the sale of something so easy to make would create a robust informal market. But informal markets usually lock out casual consumers as they don't care or want to spend the time or effort to find a trustworthy contact for A bottle of wine.

This isn't rocket science, this is super basic economics.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

And meat pie enthusiasts.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Alcohol consumption went up for many people. Way up.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For some. Which is not enough to raise averages.

Look, I've just finished a bottle of wine, so I'm no teatotler. But what data does exist shows the immediate post-21st Amendment years as lower than pre-18th years. Prohibition was an overall failure, and I celebrate Repeal Day. but it did actually reduce the national average of alcohol consumption for a time.

https://theconversation.com/how-prohibition-changed-the-way-americans-drink-100-years-ago-129854

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does that track reported consumption or alcohol related ailments?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not sure how reliable it is, then. Or it could be that drinking culture bifurcated, where casual drinking stopped, and you either made it your life or did without, and a lot of the former category fucking died.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, exactly. Tons of economics research shows how often people don't step out of line, so lack of access has real effects. Prohibition locked out casual drinkers and people with no trustworthy connect to a bootlegger.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ha jokes on you, my great great grandfather ran a mule train up from Mexico loaded with liquor. Traded it for hard ciders and shine from the other Celtic families in the area, kept a mule worth himself though.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

One set of my great grandparents met as a "musician for a speakeasy" (given some stories there's no way it was just that) and a dancer for one.

Which makes it extra hilarious how much their daughter (one of my grandmas) really really obsessed over having the appearance of being high society. Definitely an over-correction. Ended up marrying into money, but was never high society.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

There was no prohibition in my country. I assume here they drank less from 1933 to 1945, but maybe the damn Nazis got drank a lot. Who knows?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Right, and your folks smoked less weed too.