this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
403 points (98.6% liked)

politics

27045 readers
1745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You are arguing with the use of POSSESSIVE PRONOUNS.

Please look that up.

Human conversation is impossible without their liberal use. My use was accurate.

No nonsense statement was made. Stop challenging possessive pronouns.

Do you understand?

Should you do this anywhere on Earth, you will be loathed, forever.

Also, you don't know what "imperical data" means. Understanding is lost to you.

Lastly, "you" is a word that you appear to be unfamiliar with. I encourage you to look it up! YOU can be PLURAL. Not YOU specifically.

What happened to you (in this case singular, not plural)?

Our conversation is a perfect example of why you (in this case plural, not singular only) should never challenge possessive pronouns!

Stop it.

"Our grandma died today..." you "NOT MY GRANDMA"

p.s. oh my god I was wondering who you remind me of and it just hit me... are you JORDAN PETERSON ???

"What does 'our' mean?" What do you mean by 'you'?" and so on. Jordan, get off of lemmy!

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What difference does it make if you were addressing me singularly or plurally? You were still addressing me. You can't claim that you were both addressing me and not addressing me at exactly the same time. Pick a lane and stick to it.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure I can. "You" can address you specifically AND the position you represent in the discussion simultaneously.

it's never a "gotcha" to challenge such terms, there's no "gotcha". If you challenge pronouns, you will never get to an actual issue to discuss.

The user of the pronoun defines who they were addressing, never the "challenger".

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but the problem here is you made a huge assumption about who I am, who I represent and which political party I form a part of. You addressed me as such and when I pointed out your assumption was way off, now you're trying to argue about pronouns and semantics of conversations.

I'll keep bringing it back to this core point, you made a silly assumption and just can't admit it. It's as hilarious as it is sad.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That's the rub, I made NO ASSUMPTION about who you (singular) are or what you (plural) represent.

You're arguing with pronouns, don't do that.

I'll keep bringing it back to that core point, which is all that matters. Who YOU (singular) are to me is irrelevant.

Hilarious indeed.

Your correction has been corrected, now go forth and sin no more!

Are you familiar with Jordan Petersen?

I hope and pray that English is not your mother tongue. German, perhaps (this is an educated guess, not an assumption)?

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You absolutely did make an assumption because you addressed me directly and started talking about "our" parties, there's no two ways about it. I'll keep quoting your exact words here:

You're both out of control, our parties should be dismantled and dissolved.

There's no world where you're not addressing me directly and making assertions about "our" political party here. Everything else is irrelevant and you're doing a terrible job at trying to save face.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Don't make assumptions about my assumption. In a thread about US politics and a US President, WE USE PRONOUNS to avoid having to repeat all the desciptors we would need to be exactly correct.

Join us.

"Pronouns are words used to replace nouns in sentences, helping to avoid repetition."

If you argue over pronouns, NO topic can be discussed. That's why civil people never, ever argue with pronouns. Be one of us! ONE OF US ONE OF US.

There's no world were arguing with pronouns helps anybody, anywhere, at any time, as nothing else could be discussed.

Learn! YOU CAN DO IT

I could take apart each of your pronouns, but I don't, because look what happens when you challenge pronouns that have nothing to do with you.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't make assumptions about my assumption

Glad you've finally admitted it was an assumption 👍

We can finally put this whole ordeal to bed.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There you go, making assumptions that I even had an assumption.

Pronouns are hard, you'll get it someday! I believe in you (singular).

Did you know that pronouns refer to the last referenced subject unless dictated otherwise, changing the subject? IT'S TRUE.

So, figure it out.

There's a thread about sports teams, The Jerks vs The Ignorants.

Someone in the thread says "your team sucks"

Are they referring to you (singular)? Or the subject of the thread (those two teams)?

You... "Not MY team, I hate sports!"

womp womp