this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
1226 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

13651 readers
1099 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 61 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Ah, how quickly they forget how Boomers went feral over Beanie Babies.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 85 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Not really the same, I mean, Beanie Babies actually physically exist and require work to be produced. You could compare it to Labubus, Warhammer figures or collectibles of any kind but NFTs are just peak worthless stupidity with no prior equivalent

[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No prior equivalent? NFTs are basically just an evolution of fraudulent bonds and fake stocks, which people have been falling for for literally centuries.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I have a derby! It's worth a billion dollars

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A beanie baby did exist yet probably cost $1 to make, completely useless with virtually no intrinsic value, and sold for thousands...pretty valid comparison.

[–] cujo255@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But can you click 'save as' on a beanie and have an identical copy for free?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

You can have a duplicate made for a few bucks. Not free but when the difference is $1 to $1000 or $0 to $1000, no one wants your beanie baby just as much as no one wants your nft monkey picture.

Both can be authenticated to say you own the only blockchain backed copy of an nft or a rare beanie baby. Almost no one cares about either.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 5 points 4 days ago

Just because beanie babies exist in the real world doesn't make them valuable. The NFT bubble was similar to the beanie babies bubble.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And timeshares. And pyramid schemes.

I remember my parents doing one of those weird chain letter things where you'd copy the letter to a few other people, send a few quid to the people on the list, and within weeks you'd be sent thousands of pounds, if only the scheme didn't require more people than there were in the whole country.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And the stock market, and the housing market. Boomers did actually ride a huge wave of capital appreciation.

They're talking about scams, so the things the dumb boomers dumped their cash on tonot get a 3x return on investment for the low low cost of being the luckiest and worst generation in history.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

And Reaganism.

[–] johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lmao apparently people still think they're worth money. My 18 yo stepson said the other day how his mom could sell her beanie babies for "a lot of money!" We both just laughed. He thinks his mas produced Funko pops are gonna be worth a fortune one day too

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Theoretically, it is possible that 70 years down the line it might actually be worth something, assuming it is still new in box, undamaged, and it is of something that is still culturally relevant.

But the chances are so slim as to make it a worse gamble than the stock market.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Rarity is a huge factor for stuff like that. If everyone keeps theirs pristine because they know it'll be worth something it won't be rare and it'll be worthless. Collectibles that are worth the most are things that people didn't value as much at first and used them normally. They got worn and broken and discarded so it's very rare to find one in good condition.

People keep Beanie Babies and Funko pops in boxes so they'll never be worth anything because there are so many good quality ones.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago

To an extent I agree with you. The “problem” comes when people slowly start to realize that and open them or throw them out. At which point the items actually can become worth something. Though again, unlikely.

Part of the problem with most collectibles “meant” to be “worth something eventually”, are packaged in such a way that they are “enjoyable” in the packaging. You can put a sealed Funko or Beanie Baby on a shelf and you’re looking at the item itself. There’s no reason to open them.

If you truly want a “collectible”, purchase something like a game console and keep it in its box for fifty years.

[–] Neverbeaten@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

After watching many, many episodes of antiques roadshow, I’ve come to a conclusion about what kinds of things appreciate and become investments and what things are worthless.

Anything marketed and sold as a “collectible” is worthless after the fad has died down. People will hang on to them despite the bubble popping, in some sort of hope they’ll be valuable again someday. This guarantees they won’t become valuable because so many people have large collections and preserve them well.

The things that are actually valuable after 30+ years all have two things in common.

  1. They are things that hold some sort of sentimental, cultural, or historical significance
  2. They are rare. Maybe they were mass produced things that were basically commodities but no one valued them enough to preserve any. The few that are preserved (usually by a handful of unrelated individuals that may be compulsive or eccentric) become valuable because of a large group of people nostalgic for those items coinciding with scarcity. Or maybe they’re historical documents or artworks that are truly one-of-a-kind.

The things that become investments are exactly the things no one thought about collecting, but that were ubiquitous and loved enough to engender some kind of nostalgia or significance to a large group of collectors. If the demographics of the bulk of the collectors are in the 1% for some reason, then the values can get truly astronomical. But these also fluctuate in value as these rare items come into fashion to collect (or fall out of fashion). The more ephemeral or fragile in nature an item is, the more rare it is to survive for lengths of time and therefore the more value it could potentially have… things like cardboard toys from the 1920s can be incredibly valuable if they’re in great condition. Those were the cheapest toys and likely considered somewhat disposable back then. No one really valued them at the time, so very few were preserved.

All that said, anything lots of people keep as mint as possible in their boxes will likely never be as valuable as when they were initially sold as new. Especially if “collectible” was a key marketing point for it.

[–] BunScientist@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

I don't know if this applies to funkos, but I recently learned that anime figurines will get sticky if boxed for too long, something plasticizer evaporating and having nowhere to escape to it sticks to the figurine and makes it kinda gooey and shiny, so I don't know if you could have it "undamaged" in its box after so long.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pet rocks.

And every ridiculous “must have” Christmas toy craze.

Nowadays people spend their money on sensible crazes, like Stanley Mugs.

Nowadays people spend their money on sensible crazes, like Stanley Mugs.

AKA "Big Dumb Cups"