this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23048 readers
93 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/34242793

Does Venezuela have no army at all?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 63 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They didn't "invade." They did an infiltration over time to to kidnap Maduro and then blew stuff up as cover for the extraction.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 50 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Foreign troops on the ground does not constitute a country being invaded? Absolutely ridiculous

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 54 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is not an invasion. An invasion implies occupation of territory by troops, and would be disastrous for the US.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

Right, and the entire reason the US has done this is so they can install their puppet and occupy Venezuela as an oil colony. This was an invasion. A targeted one but absolutely is intended to directly lead to an occupation

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 42 points 4 months ago

If you want to be pedantic any infiltration could be considered an invasion. But invasion usually connotates an army taking territory.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

An invasion is done en mass and in the open with the intention of holding territory. This was a raid or an incursion.