this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
115 points (99.1% liked)

Slop.

760 readers
579 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xcancel.com/Kasparov63/status/2006907711607418920

TagsGarry Kasparov; Mamdani; collectivism; socialism

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It is funny how we consider being good at Chess a sign of general intelligence. "This guy is good at a board game, he must have great insights into politics"

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe it was in an earlier era, but at this point it's pretty well established that to be a top chess guy you basically have to forsake all other mental tasks.

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Nah, Bobby Fisher and Kasparov fully disabused that notion to anyone who was paying attention.

[–] invo_rt@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

"This guy is good at a board game, he must have great insights into politics"

"This guy is good at video games, he must have great insights into politics"

"This guy is a comedian, he must have great insights into politics"

"This guy is an influencer, he must have great insights into politics"

Many such cases joker-troll

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 week ago

a little gauche to quote myself but

many chess grandmasters have a remarkable degree of arrogance for how entirely unimpressive being very good at a board game is