this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2654 readers
344 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yet a study that involved giving homeless people money without strings attached showed that most spent it on things to improve their future, like buying a used car, paying off debt, pursuing education, starting a business and getting a home. There were no adverse outcomes for any of the participants.

But still our society will judge the homeless and make out they're all feckless addicts who can't be trusted with help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] honeyontoast@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is insanely easy to end up homeless, the vast majority of the working class could last a month, maybe two if they've got some savings.

What's noticeable here is the £2,000 given is quite a big lump sum, actually capable of helping people make a difference. It'd be inhumane to test it, but if that £2,000 was split up into 12 payments of £166, would it have made as much of a difference? I doubt it. Yet that's how most benefits work, a pittance a month. Just enough to keep you alive, nowhere near enough to actually help lift people out of poverty.

That's a good point. Especially with how benefits are usually granted for a short time and many people fail the reassessments, get into debt to survive before the appeal reinstates their benefits, it's difficult to even get out of the debt cycle on benefits. But they get accused of being feckless.