this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
778 points (99.0% liked)
Linux Gaming
22863 readers
1235 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
Resources
WWW:
- Linux Gaming wiki
- Gaming on Linux
- ProtonDB
- Lutris
- PCGamingWiki
- LibreGameWiki
- Boiling Steam
- Phoronix
- Linux VR Adventures
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am brave enough to say it: The ocean has water in it.
Praise me for my braveness.
'zacly.
Best reply.
Next you'll say the ocean is a soup.
Salt, meat, vegetables--it is soup.
I get the sentiment but the article is more targeted at the PC gaming crowd that isn't exactly tech-illiterate but probably only knows Linux from memes about it requiring you to recompile a kernel to install Chrome or some other BS like that
I think a good portion of Lemmy and the fediverse already know it's been at this level for a long while now but I'm excited to see articles like this since it means the tide is turning against Windows for the average user
Yeah, though would be better if the well were not poisoned, misleading perceptions, with words like "brave" and "now".
i think this bravery is worthy of a marble carving. 12 stories tall, of you pointing at the ocean
Big if true.
Valorant DaddleDew,
Doth proudly proclaim.
Sees that the sea is due
To torrential rain.
Dew truly polymath,
Paragon of deep.
Scrolls Lemmy in the bath
And nods right off to sleep.
I heard somewhere that by the time the scientific community officially announces life on mars the rest of us will have already concluded that there is life on mars. I feel like this is the same thing.
The problem is there's a large difference between the 50% the average person needs and the 99.9% the scientific community needs. It's just a different level of proof they're looking for.
Because science doesn't work on circumstantial evidence, but hard proof.