this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
282 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29200 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Insurrection" or "coup attempt," not "riot."

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree the title should label it as such; however, Smith does call it an insurrection and "coup attempt" at the hearing multiple times, if that matters.

We had an elector in Pennsylvania who is a former congressman, who was going to be an elector for President Trump, who said that what they were trying to do was an attempt to overthrow the government and illegal," Smith said.

Smith said that Trump in the weeks leading to the insurrection got "people to believe fraud claims that weren't true."

[–] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Nice to know it's NPR to blame for engaging in disinformation by downplaying it, not Jack Smith himself. Thanks!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The media has done a lot of that sort of thing since J6. Even with Donvict out of office, they'd often resort to calling it a "riot". Probably the nicest thing you could say was that it was insurrection, it's probably more accurate to call it an act of terrorism, and the participants that planned by bringing weapons and cable ties and so on are terrorists.

But the pussies in the media kept shying away from calling this even an insurrection, FFS.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's not quite it either. From the transcript:

The attack that happened at the Capitol, part of this case, does not happen without [Trump]