this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
89 points (96.8% liked)
Slop.
753 readers
459 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How much you wanna bet deceptichum @ quokk.a or w/e is a chud just stirring shit and db0 is too much of a loser to notice
Based on my interactions with both, the former is a "true believer" to the point of calling Nazis freed from prison during the Hungarian counter revolution in 1956 genuine progressives fighting against soviet authoritarianism, and the latter is cognizant of that but keeps them around to trigger the "tankies."
Didn't they go as far as saying the extermination of Soviet citizens by the Nazis was a good thing, and db0 defended it because these people will always side with fascists over leftists
That was another user that made that claim, but the same reasoning they are tolerated, they "trigger the tankies." The user that made the claim claims that they thought the 27 million casualties were only in the Red Army, but that's still a disgusting statement to make and is exactly an example of faux-anarchists siding with fascists over communists.
I'm not completely sure that was honest. It wasn't the first time that user had made that exact argument and faced backlash for it. IIRC I found one from about 10 months prior in the modlog and there was at least one reply that explained that that was not the case. Likely that's not the only time that user did that and not the only clarifying reply that user received. Also, as you say, that's still nazi apologia.
Agreed, I'm unconvinced as well, my point is that even if we take them at their word most charitably it's still Nazi apologia.