this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
60 points (96.9% liked)
Lord Of The Rings Memes
766 readers
176 users here now
A comm for Lord Of The Rings Memes!
Rules:
-
Follow the ToS of Piefed.social
-
Don't be too rough with each other! We're here to appreciate, and sometimes lightly rib, Tolkien's fantastic creation, and all of its derivative works. Arguments happen, but remember, in the words of Tolkien, that food and cheer and good song are what make a merrier world!
-
AI content will be removed at moderator discretion. We ultimately want to keep AI content in this comm to a minimum, so while unknowingly sharing an AI meme might not always merit a removal, things like AI videos and the like will generally be removed.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think about this sometimes. What happens if people of the far future decide they don't want to go back to the old climate. What if they prefer things the way they are?
Imagine we have a really catastrophic warming scenario. A few centuries from now, the human population of a few hundred million mostly huddles around the upper latitudes, land that was uninhabitable tundra in our time. Imagine if natural systems start slowly lowering the greenhouse gas level back down, or if someone wants to scrub the excess carbon from the atmosphere. How would those people react?
Will they want to restore the Earth to how it was? Sure, that would probably be better for humans and nature overall, but what about their society specifically? Are they going to want to relocate their entire population back to the lower latitudes? And consider, the process that drove humans to those high latitudes was likely a historical event on the order of the Black Death, an epochal catastrophe whose emotional damage was so great that we still feel its echos today.
And the people then are being asked to willingly sign up for a second round of forced migration? And then you have the problem of, who exactly gets to own all this newly habitable land opening up in the lower latitudes? Who gets to own the land that was once inhabited, but had been abandoned for centuries? Who gets to own what was once China, India, of the Continental United States? How do you compensate people whose homes are going to be rendered back into polar wasteland?
I can see such a society simply choosing to keep things as they are. It may simply be too practically difficult to restore the old world. Even if the net condition of humanity and nature would improve, this is the exact kind of global coordination problem that global warming was in the first place!
They might start pointlessly burning carbon just to keep the temperature up, burning just enough to cancel out what the planet naturally recycles. They might install solar mirrors, except designed warm the planet rather than cooling it.
Or maybe the powers that be simply let the changes happen anyway, and they don't even try to make the transition equitable. The new lands get handed to the rich and connected. Everyone else gets told to pound sand.
It's interesting considering a far future that has almost the exact opposite problem as we do, and yet they would be under very similar pressures and struggles as we are.
I get what you're saying, but you're way overestimating the survival rate, and also using the myth that people (and everything that sustains them) will just move northwards. Habitability is far more than just the temperature range. You mention tundra, and the first thing to consider is how long it takes to form soil that things can grow in from a place that has none. It's hundreds to thousands of years for just a small amount. Then there's the weather. Warmer Earth means volatile systems and changing dynamics. Who's to say there will be a temperate, stable area in the few places left to live? It's not even something we can reliably simulate, as we have no idea what we're heading into.
There's more, but no reason to get too doom and gloom. I just wanted to point out the biggest thing your whole idea is resting on isn't something that's likely.
I think we also aren't giving humans enough survivability credit. There have been native peoples who have lived from deserts, arctics, jungles and everything in between. A lot of this often relys on the natural environment but humans are surprsingly resourceful. Anything modern societies consider junk or trash now could still be used be it as fuel, makeshift tools or they repair it enough to use it. So long as the people in the society can reach sexual maturity, humans will live on.
Theres an episode of survivor man where he spends a few days on an arctic coast and a lot of what he relied on at times was the trash that floated in from the ocean. Something like a broken plastic barrel can provide shelter.
Only during the Holocene period. We're very resourceful, but there are limitations. The breaking point may not be our own selves, but things we rely on like food and water and temperature control.
I mean, sure. We may find ways to adapt, new food sources, get lucky with the weather behavior. Anyone who says they're sure of the future is lying. It just seems very unlikely in a runaway hothouse Earth scenario that we can do well. Large animal forms didn't do well in the last heating event (the PETM) and ones that survived evolved into smaller forms to do so (large exotherms don't do well with heat removal). They evolved because the PETM took tens of thousands of years to ramp up. I'm sure you've seen the science reports about how current rate of heating is faster than anything we have geologic evidence of before.
The next heatwaves will give a glimpse into how well we can adapt. The western world has its technology and energy to rely on for a while, the rest of the world doesn't.
People are already dying from climate change