this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
69 points (96.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

3593 readers
407 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Starting Thursday, Americans in five states who get government help paying for groceries will see new restrictions on soda, candy and other foods they can buy with those benefits.

Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska, Utah and West Virginia are the first of at least 18 states to enact waivers prohibiting the purchase of certain foods through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.

It’s part of a push by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to urge states to strip foods regarded as unhealthy from the $100 billion federal program -- long known as food stamps -- that serves 42 million Americans.

“We cannot continue a system that forces taxpayers to fund programs that make people sick and then pay a second time to treat the illnesses those very programs help create,” Kennedy said in a statement in December.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Food stamps have been regulated since day fucking uno dude

Where I live you can spend them on any food that isn’t hot. Sorry about your shithole state.

Demanding Congress let you use WIC to buy a Big Mac?

You actually can use SNAP to buy a Big Mac if you meet certain conditions, which makes sense if you spend five fucking seconds to think about how food stamps are also issued to people without kitchens or even homes. For some people the options really are Big Mac or nothing.

Tax the rich, totally, and maybe in 2028 we can start that. But I don’t want to wait to fix SNAP and you play with the hand you’re dealt

So you want to cooperate with Republicans to restrict what poor people can use food stamps on, and somehow have deluded yourself into believing this is leftist? lmao

Everything you talk about wanting to implement costs money. Who’s analyzing every single food item that comes out on the market and certifying it? Who’s paying for that? How are small businesses going to afford it for every food item they produce? Because that’s a great way to ensure only huge corporations get any money from WIC and food stamps.

The disgust you have for the poor is dripping off every word you type, and it’s gross. If you can’t deal with poor people feeding themselves the ‘wrong’ foods with their food stamps, that’s a personal issue you need to cope with. Especially considering you’ve never even used food stamps in a red state (silence is admission). Try listening to people on food stamps who have dealt with this instead of barging in and declaring you know how to fix their lives better than they do.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

literally cites a regulation in counterpoint about how food stamps aren't regulated.

You've went off the plot here. I'll bring us back to base: What's the "N" in SNAP stand for? One word answers only.

Give me your proposal for taxpayer-funded Whoppers. But don't shit up my nutrition (oops, I gave away the answer) program to pay for it. It really is that simple.

ad hominem and le cope

L.

MAO, even