this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
64 points (95.7% liked)
Progressive Politics
3591 readers
388 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Being able to buy junk food instead of actual nutrition with food stamps is a large boon to the junk food industry paid from by tax dollars. Poor people are more likely to buy junk food as well, so not enabling that vice with tax money could be seen as a positive.
On the other hand giving the government powers like this is usually a slippery slope which will get abused more and more in the future.
So instead of holding junk food companies in any way responsible, we are going to make sure that poor can’t get anything enjoyable! Steamed cabbage and leftover meat cuttings is all you’ll get and you’ll like it! Or else you wouldn’t be poor!
Junk food companies could be held responsible by people not being able to purchase their goods in a subsidized way if they aren't healthy. Thus they make less profit. Whether that actually is what will happen here is doubtful.
You act like junk food is the only thing enjoyable they can get. Naw junk food is a complete waste of money. Ive thought for years it shouldve been restricted, i have known people who blew ALL of their food stamps on shit. Its a government program to feed people, not to induce diabetes.
It betrays a deep lack of education, palate, and kitchen experience in yourself that you equate junk foods to "enjoyable" and that [healthy greens] and [meat] are in any way punishments.
Food deserts and people working multiple jobs, rough sleeping. It's cruel. Allow them to buy hot prepared meals for a comparable cost or stop harassing them.
Can't say I disagree with that. My biggest gripe is that it's mainly poor people who suffer the vicious cycle of bad nutrition from junk food. I think it's reasonable to say a healthy alternative should be availible before taking away the junk food.
I mean some large convenience stores will sell a 4oz boxed salad for $8-9 or 4 1oz bags of chips for $2. Corporate farms and Frito - Lays both get subsidies. Plus people with bad or no teeth can hold a chip in the mouth until it's soft. Not so much an apple. Also instant cereal packets of oats or grits cost as much for 8 small packets as a whole 16 oz box -- if you only had time, tools and space to cook it.
Recently on my way to work, a convenience store let me get a hot cup of water for my green tea bag for free. A cup of bad coffee was $2. I think most stores charge for the cup of water, though.
To a certain extent, insofar as keeping capitalism is concerned, I think this is a failure of education. These companies supposedly pay taxes too and that money should go to educating the populace on ramifications of choosing, for instance, Doritos.