this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
214 points (96.1% liked)

memes

18649 readers
2488 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OK then.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LytiaNP@lemmy.today 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I have given up reading but would pay handsomely* for a tldr

*with an upvote

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Aside from the opt out will potentially encourage bullying, I don't really get their argument there tbh. By the logic they are using, federation as a whole would be a violation of their terms. Usage of the ActivityPub in it's entirety would do the same thing they are complaining about. If you don't want your data being cycled to god knows who, I would not recommend any ActivityPub platform and if you decide to anyway, disabling federation, and using authenticated endpoints. They are likely better off in a closed environment but even those generally are public access.

It reminds me of the people who used to have content licenses appended to their comments, I'm not convinced that having it was even enforceable due to federation.