this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
596 points (99.8% liked)

People Mastodon

212 readers
374 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"the initial question doesn't frame it like that"

*proceeds to frame it as equivalent and still defend the bear option

[โ€“] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What the... No, your objection was "picking and choos[ing]" (ex:) if you were just in the woods with a bear vs. had to interact with a man

I said yes, that's not the initial question, and presented that simply being alone in the woods with a bear is an extremely common occurence, a reference to the "170 million black bears of prigozhin" comment from earlier.

Now you're mad I'm presenting those two options as always having been treated as their equivalent forms, and yet still maintaining my earlier position after explaining the details of the question. But... why would my answer have changed? My position or the premise it was based on never changed. I never misunderstood anything about the question. You were the one that interpreted the discussion incorrectly.