this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
279 points (100.0% liked)

World News

51547 readers
2882 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 4,000 elementary, middle and high schools across Korea have shut their doors as the country’s student population shrinks, new data shows.

According to the Ministry of Education’s latest figures, revealed on Sunday by Rep. Jin Sun-mee of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea, since 1980, 4,008 schools under 17 regional education offices nationwide have closed as of March this year. During the period, the number of enrolled students decreased from 9.9 million to 5.07 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Elshender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kurzgesagt did a video on how South Korea will probably collapse due to their massively low birth rate.

https://youtu.be/Ufmu1WD2TSk

Soon there will be massive amounts of unemployed elderly, with no one to take care of them.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No there won’t. The reason their birth rates are low is because they are so wealthy.

Low birth rates are sold to us as bad by neoliberals/capitalists because they believe that growth is the only way out of every problem. Unlimited growth is a terrible blunt instrument that’s basically created the unsustainable and unequal monster we live in today in the west.

Fact is that depopulation is the reality of the future and we should keep and eye on South Korea so we can learn from what they do.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How does being wealthy cause low birth rates? Maybe the other way (less population causes concentration of wealth or maybe I'm so busy making money I don't have time to make babies) but I don't see wealth causing low birth.

Are you saying people are thinking "look at this 6 figure bank account, we shouldn't have any children, we just need to increase it to 7"

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How does being wealthy cause low birth rates?

Pretty simple actually. When you are impoverished, you need a lot of kids for two main reasons: 1) when you're too poor to develop a health-care system, you have alot of kids so that your society still functions after a few kids die off due to a lack of affordable and accessible health care; and 2) you need a high population to do all the labor needed for you and your tribe to survive.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

True, as I think about it, it may be an inverse parabolic function. Low wealth is lots of kids(need help to survive) , sustainable wealth low kids(I can support myself but no more) , high wealth high kids(I'm so great my genes must be passed on and I have the means to do so) ...

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

This has been a common pattern globally. A lot of other wealthy countries only have stable (desired for economic growth) population numbers/growth only because of large scale immigration. ie. US and Canada. Which countries like South Korea, Japan, or China are still quite strict on.

Doesn't help that child raring has become exceedingly expensive per child as well in wealthy countries.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In a lot of places a parent working is basically pointless if they pay for childcare. A daycare near me was 600 a week. And that was only from 330(after school got out) to 600. If you work 9-5 but school gets out at 330 about 15 dollars per hour of your pay goes to daycare. If you make less than 20 an hour is that even worth working?

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

On top of that there are expensive academic tutors and extracurricular activities that are seen as necessary in competitive countries.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 day ago

high wealth high kids

Even the most wealthy have 2 kids on average. Some famous rich people have more but the birth rate among the top 1% is still below replacement level.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It’s not just one reason…I’m speaking broadly.

…but you can basically graph birth rates inversely with wealth.