this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
299 points (96.9% liked)

politics

26881 readers
1903 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greene gives lengthy interview with New York Times days before stepping down as congresswoman for Georgia

Marjorie Taylor Greene, now just days away from stepping down as a congresswoman for Georgia, has said in her latest mea culpa interview that she “was just so naive” for believing that Donald Trump was a man of the people.

In a lengthy interview with the New York Times that examines her break with the president after years of devotion, Greene explained that a series of minor ruptures with the president culminated in a total breach after conservative influencer Charlie Kirk was killed in September.

The third-term Georgia congresswoman said she was watching Kirk’s memorial service on TV when his widow Erika said she forgave her husband’s killer. But then Trump took the stage to say that unlike Kirk – “a missionary with a noble spirit” who did not “hate” his opponents, Trump said he disagreed.

“I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them,” Trump said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Don't worry. The Democrats will come up with a totally useless ticket that will make them seem viable. My money is on Cuomo/Sinema or something equally atrocious.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Newsom and Hochul

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The only way they could pick someone as VP that is more reviled by nearly everyone would be to pick Kyrsten Sinema. Who started in the Green Party, by the way. Being affiliated with that party should probably be considered a red flag at this point.

Maybe Kirsten Gillibrand is nearly as toxic, for those that remember her when it comes to Al Franken.

Between Fetterman, Sinema, Cuomo, and Gillibrand it's hard to pick which one is more annoying.

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’ll run a Clinton/Occasio-Cortez ticket for the bulk of the year and then change it to Newsom/Cuomo in the last three weeks. If anyone can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it’s the opposition party we call the Democrats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't you think Cuomo would be just a bit too obvious, even assuming your conspiracy theory of Democrats trying to lose is true?

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats trying to lose is as much a conspiracy theory as gravity is the force that keeps you from floating away when you jump in the air.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

That's just dumb

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Vote in the primary, it's our best shot to have a fair one since Carter.

A lot of people are going to try and convince people not to vote in the Dem primary because of that.

That would require these people to do something more than just bitch into the void. Might be a bridge too far for them.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Newsom is the Next Man Up. Anyone else who runs in the Primary is really just auditioning for VP.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

He's certainly the establishment pick.