this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
15 points (94.1% liked)

UK Politics

4521 readers
22 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To me it's very weird how every election I've been part of so far in the UK has been viewed as basically predetermined long ahead of time. What's up with that?

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People are idiots who happily vote for a catchy slogan from a lovable rascal, than vote for their interests. Especially if said rascal has the financial banking of a few billionaires, can spread the slogan far and wide across all media, and can even cow the official news sources to feature it

[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

financial backing of a few billionaires

Fun fact, most of reform's donors are either deeply invested in the fossil fuel industry or outright climate change deniers.

https://www.desmog.com/2024/06/04/nigel-farage-reform-uk-party-2-3-million-fossil-fuel-interests-climate-deniers-polluters-since-2019-election/

(Although I would be careful with the 92% number, it's technically accurate but will be misleading if you try to extrapolate policy from it, since the donors aren't single-issue donors)

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I assume that's how they keep rioting at a minimum. Nobody questions if everything is going according to how they were told it would be, to paraphrase the Joker.