this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
47 points (98.0% liked)

Communism

10072 readers
23 users here now

Discussion Community for fellow Marxist-Leninists and other Marxists.

Rules for /c/communism

Rules that visitors must follow to participate. May be used as reasons to report or ban.

  1. No non-marxists

This subreddit is here to facilitate discussion between marxists.

There are other communities aimed at helping along new communists. This community isn't here to convert naysayers to marxism.

If you are a member of the police, armed forces, or any other part of the repressive state apparatus of capitalist nations, you will be banned.

  1. No oppressive language

Do not attempt to justify your use of oppressive language.

Doing this will almost assuredly result in a ban. Accept the criticism in a principled manner, edit your post or comment accordingly, and move on, learning from your mistake.

We believe that speech, like everything else, has a class character, and that some speech can be oppressive. This is why speech that is patriarchal, white supremacist, cissupremacist, homophobic, ableist, or otherwise oppressive is banned.

TERF is not a slur.

  1. No low quality or off-topic posts

Posts that are low-effort or otherwise irrelevant will be removed.

This is not a place to engage in meta-drama or discuss random reactionaries on lemmy or anywhere else.

This includes memes and circlejerking.

This includes most images, such as random books or memorabilia you found.

We ask that amerikan posters refrain from posting about US bourgeois politics. The rest of the world really doesn’t care that much.

  1. No basic questions about marxism

Posts asking entry-level questions will be removed.

Questions like “What is Maoism?” or “Why do Stalinists believe what they do?” will be removed, as they are not the focus on this forum.

  1. No sectarianism

Marxists of all tendencies are welcome here.

Refrain from sectarianism, defined here as unprincipled criticism. Posts trash-talking a certain tendency or marxist figure will be removed. Circlejerking, throwing insults around, and other pettiness is unacceptable.

If criticisms must be made, make them in a principled manner, applying Marxist analysis.

The goal of this subreddit is the accretion of theory and knowledge and the promotion of quality discussion and criticism.

Check out ProleWiki for a communist wikipedia.

Communism study guide

bottombanner

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just wanted to vent about this topic for a bit, because this is something that annoys me to no end. You see so many people complain nowadays about how China "stole" something from the West, whether that's technology or just some idea for a product.

So many times this is just racism, but yes, there are times when Chinese manufacturers were very likely inspired by a Western design. So what? Let's even assume that they added nothing of their own to it and just took the idea as-is (which is not usually the case; as we have seen by now, imitation is only the first step; eventually China learns and starts to innovate and even advance ahead of the West).

Even in those extreme cases, either the original product was not made anywhere near as cheaply, or as efficiently, or maybe even mass produced at all. Let's say someone showcases online some artisanal design of something cool they made, but never tried or intended to mass produce, and some manufacturer (doesn't even have to be in China, can even be in a Western country) decides to take that design and mass produce it and sell it, did they really do something wrong?

Did they "steal" anything? As in physically take something away from the original creator that they now no longer possess? No. On the contrary, they worked out how to actually produce that design in a way that is commercially viable, and provided the world with a product that people would not have had if this manufacturer had not taken up that idea and actually made it a mass produced reality.

So where is the "crime"? What would have happened if the first hominid who discovered how to make fire told all the other hominids: "Hey, you're not allowed to make fires, this was my idea and if you use it for your own benefit, it's stealing!". How about the first inventor of the wheel? "No, no one else can make wheels, else you're stealing my design! Even if i decide not to make any more of them than this one prototype."

Why do so many people nowadays accept this argument, when all throughout human history this sort of behavior would have gotten you laughed out of the village? Humanity progresses by sharing knowledge, by imitating and copying other people's ideas. And if someone can implement your own idea better than you yourself can, why shouldn't they?

This isn't theft. "Intellectual property" is the real theft: theft from humanity. Holding back progress because you could have made money off of it first, or even just because your ego demands recognition, is that justified? Is that something that we as a society should accept?

This criticism of course extends even more so to the level of corporations which go absolutely crazy with hoarding patents and copyrights, often to things which they didn't even create but just "bought the rights" to (a crazy, absurd concept btw...i mean even if you believe the originator of an idea should have a special right, how can anyone believe that this right is something that can be bought and sold!?), even long past the point when they themselves are no longer using these IPs to make money. I call this is a crime against humanity.

Also, so-called "piracy" of digital media has nothing to do with actual piracy, which is actually physically taking something by force from someone else. You don't take anything from anyone when you copy a sequence of ones and zeros. The original sequence is still there, you didn't delete it, you just duplicated it.

One of the biggest psyops ever pulled on us as a society is convincing us that making copies of existing digital media is somehow equivalent to "theft".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, yes, and? If the original creator wants the art to be free they can still post it on free websites. Whoever still buys the non-free version of the same thing they could easily get for free is just a dupe at that point, no? Obviously it's a shitty thing to do, taking credit for other people's work, but the real underlying problem is the fact that this absurd concept of "selling" something that can just be endlessly duplicated via a copy-and-paste operation has somehow come to be accepted as normal. That shouldn't even be a thing.

[–] Marat@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In confused how this idea conflicts with what I am saying. Having your work taken and sold while you're trying to give it to people for free is disheartening. I havent advocated for some form of system of redress, I am simply saying it hurts us to have our work be used for other people's gain without our consent. I, like you, am saying it's a "shitty thing to do."