this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
771 points (99.9% liked)

PhilosophyMemes

573 readers
6 users here now

Memes must be related to phil.

The Memiverse:
!90s_memes@quokk.au
!y2k_memes@quokk.au
!sigh_fi@quokk.au

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes. And one of the implications they are sarcastically trying to make with the chicken is that the other person would say an animal (or at least a chicken) can't be a woman just because it lays eggs, in contrast to their previous statement defining what a woman is.

I agree a chicken isn't a woman just because it lays eggs. But is there any other reason why a chicken couldn't be a woman?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Because only people can be men and women.

Our sexes are called female/male, so a chicken which has no concept of gender but is of the female sex would be called a hen or described as female.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But what about dogs and cats that think they're people? Won't you think of the kittens? Won't somebody PLEASE think of the kittens?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 4 months ago

Don't be silly, dogs and cats can never be men or women, they're only good boys and good girls.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

... Generally speaking, we define a woman as a human.