this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
121 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8544 readers
392 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've gotten Basic Economice by Sowell, crank that he is, in response to this very question.

[–] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh hey I read this recently (know thine enemy and all that). It’s actually laugh-out-loud hilarious. He literally says at one point that price gouging is a good thing during natural disasters, because otherwise no one would be incentivised to deliver humanitarian supplies

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep! I also checked it out a bit and yea, you're spot-on.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

John Stossel-thought

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The more I hear about it the more I wonder how no one seems to have thought of writing an article or a video dunking on how stupid and ridiculous neo-liberal economic theories are yet.

[–] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The system justifies itself: they train and pay thousands of economists to believe their own hype, and make it so that those economists are the only β€œauthoritative” sources, and all the voices of sanity are drowned out.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still, you would think at least one communist somewhere would have written a debunking of modern vulgar economics by now, especially given the fact that with how obviously nonsensical neoclassic economics is, it's probably the weakest pillar of the modern liberal ideology and the easiest to attack for Marxists.

[–] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m sure there are plenty of books attacking neoclassic economics, but I’m not really familiar with the video content in this space. Maybe some others have suggestions. @TankieTanuki@hexbear.net is there anything you might know of/on TankieTube?

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As far as I know there is this one: Why the Labor Theory of Value is Correct - Criticism of Marshall's

And kind of this one: guide to marxist economics introduction episode in which thefinnishbolshevik briefly talk about what Marx called vulgar economics.

And that's about it for criticism from a Marxist perspective I think.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nice. You've clearly put in more hours in the posting trenches than me though.

What are the chances they panicked and googled "basic economics" two seconds prior?

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly pretty low, they seemed too committed to the bit.