this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
291 points (94.2% liked)

Would You Rather

987 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/WouldYouRather, where we present you with the toughest, most ridiculous choices you never knew you had to make! Would you rather have a third arm that's only useful for picking your nose, or be able to talk to animals but only if they're wearing hats? Yeah, it's that kind of vibe. Come for the absurdity, stay because you've clearly got nothing better to do with your life.

Rules:

  1. Follow dbzer0 rules.
  2. Start posts off with "WYR:"

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
291
Wyr (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 month ago by SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/wouldyourather@lemmy.dbzer0.com
182 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly the premise sounds fun, atleast in comparison to most hypotheticals. That being said an ammount of money that doesn't seem like it would cover roughly half my remaining life. Including medical issues brought on by this arrangement

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  1. Atleast is not a word.
  2. Ammount is not a word.
  3. Move to a country where healthcare is paid by taxes and not mercenary care and then you're good.
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Atleast and ammount are more words than JuSt MoVe is helpful advice.

[–] nostrauxendar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Jesus christ, the dictionary squad are here boys, let's get outta here!

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

Don't act like universal healthcare solves all your healthcare problems. These systems are still subject to capitalism, defunding, and authoritarian regulations, on top of racism and sexism. The rich can meanwhile afford all the private healthcare they want.