this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
291 points (94.2% liked)
Would You Rather
987 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to c/WouldYouRather, where we present you with the toughest, most ridiculous choices you never knew you had to make! Would you rather have a third arm that's only useful for picking your nose, or be able to talk to animals but only if they're wearing hats? Yeah, it's that kind of vibe. Come for the absurdity, stay because you've clearly got nothing better to do with your life.
Rules:
- Follow dbzer0 rules.
- Start posts off with "WYR:"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For those who take it, for what amount would you not take it
I'd do it for free. The ability to recreate the event at regular intervals for five years would be worth more than the money
Shshshsh! You just lost yourself a hundred mil, to answer a question you were not asked. XD
Honestly the premise sounds fun, atleast in comparison to most hypotheticals. That being said an ammount of money that doesn't seem like it would cover roughly half my remaining life. Including medical issues brought on by this arrangement
Atleast and ammount are more words than JuSt MoVe is helpful advice.
Jesus christ, the dictionary squad are here boys, let's get outta here!
Don't act like universal healthcare solves all your healthcare problems. These systems are still subject to capitalism, defunding, and authoritarian regulations, on top of racism and sexism. The rich can meanwhile afford all the private healthcare they want.
eh. below 2 mil.
57 million. (+ the 100 million). Give or take, based on currency devaluation situation at time of offer.
[Edit: Then I could open up a really impressive health hub.]