this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
-11 points (33.3% liked)

Working Class Calendar

1606 readers
61 users here now

!workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world is a working class calendar inspired by the now (2023-06-25) closed reddit r/aPeoplesCalendar aPeoplesCalendar.org, where we can post daily events.

Rules

All the requirements of the code of conduct of the instance must be followed.

Community Rules

1. It's against the rules the apology for fascism, racism, chauvinism, imperialism, capitalism, sexism, ableism, ageism, and heterosexism and attitudes according to these isms.

2. The posts should be about past working class events or about the community.

3. Cross-posting is welcomed.

4. Be polite.

5. Any language is welcomed.

Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Joseph Stalin (1878 - 1953)

Wed Dec 18, 1878

Image

Image: **


Joseph Stalin, born on this day in 1878, was a Marxist-Leninist revolutionary and politician who led the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953. "Real liberty can exist only where exploitation has been abolished."

Born to a poor family in modern day Georgia, Stalin joined the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party as a youth. He edited the party's newspaper Pravda and raised funds for Vladimir Lenin's Bolshevik faction via robberies, kidnappings, and protection rackets. After the Bolsheviks seized power during the 1917 October Revolution, Stalin joined its governing Politburo and assumed leadership over the country following Lenin's death in 1924.

Through the Five-Year Plans developed under his leadership, the Soviet Union collectivized its agricultural sector and rapidly industrialized, creating a centralized command economy. This rapid change caused disruptions in food production that were a factor in the famine of 1932 - 1933. Despite this setback, the first five-year plan greatly increased the country's productive capacity.

Although the Soviet Union under Stalin's leadership succeeded in rapidly industrializing Russia, helping end Russian monarchial rule, defeating fascist movements in Europe, and opposing American imperialism, Stalin's detractors hold him responsible for unjust political repression, suppression of labor movements, episodes of ethnic cleansing during the Great Purge of 1937-38, and the criminalization of homosexuality.

Shortly after Stalin's death, the Soviet Union went through a period of "de-Stalinization". His successor, Nikita Khrushchev, gave a series of remarks titled "On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences" (also known as the "Secret Speech") to a closed session of the national congress, denouncing Stalin's political repression and the cult of personality that surrounded him.

Stalin remains popular in Russia, with 70% of Russians approving of Stalin’s role in Russian history, according to a poll published by the Levada Center in 2019. Sociologist Leonty Byzov stated: "Stalin begins to be perceived as a symbol of justice and an alternative to the current government, deemed unfair, cruel and not caring about people".

"It is difficult for me to imagine what 'personal liberty' is enjoyed by an unemployed person, who goes about hungry, and cannot find employment. Real liberty can exist only where exploitation has been abolished, where there is no oppression of some by others, where there is no unemployment and poverty, where a man is not haunted by the fear of being tomorrow deprived of work, of home and of bread. Only in such a society is real, and not paper, personal and every other liberty possible."

- Joseph Stalin


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Not sure if we should include him, for his suppression of anarchism and causing tons of deaths. But on the flipside he also made communism triumph over Nazism, and defeated the Nazis. That's a win.

I think the best description is "include but heavily criticise", or "do not include, but mention both his efforts for and against the labourers".

When we suppress information, we do not help the labourers; what we need is education and awareness.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

True but he also allied with the nazis, and, as you mentioned the massive amounts of russias he had killed

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

And the ukranians, jews karelians and other cultures he genocided and persecuted. Plus anyone going against him, and conquering lands to expand the red empire

Workers starving while he enriched himself and grew a fat belly

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If you're talking about the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, it was a strategic move, not a tacit approval of Nazism. This revisionist/horseshoe theory history needs to die.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This revisionist/horseshoe theory history needs to die.

Yet here you are. The guy fucking allied with nazis, tacit approval or nazism or not, he was still on their side...

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Ridiculous oversimplification of the situation in Europe at the time. The USSR was vastly underprepared for the inevitable German invasion. They had to buy time to prepare for what was coming. They suffered massive losses early in Barbarossa even with the time they made to prepare.

That's what pragmatism is. Or they could have put ideology before strategy and risked having the Soviet lands wiped out for Lebensraum.

None of that will matter though if your intent is to push the false narrative that Soviets and Nazis are basically the same thing...

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You complain about revisionism, yet you continue to perpetuate it. And you're putting words in my mouth. It's not an over simplification it is a fact that the russians allied with nazis. You can excuse it away anyway you want.

[–] redrumBot@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The Molotov-Riventtrop Pact was a nonaggression pact, not an alliance pact. Please, stop with the miss-information.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure and this is nothing too right?German–Soviet Boundary and Friendship Treaty, all a part of the molotov riventtrop pact. If it smells like a pig, squeals like a pig and looks like a pig, doesn't matter what you call it. It's a pig

[–] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For your information, the USSR was the last country to sign a non-agression pact, a year after the UK and France signed their own non-agression pacts with Germany. The Union was campaigning for an antifascist alliance with France and the UK who rather preferred to develop their economic political relations with the fascists (the only thing capitalists are known for).

So, having lost any hopes for antifascist alliance after realizing that they were being intentionally isolated by the capitalists and fascists, and sensing that an invasion is imminent, the USSR only had one practical solution, should they want the communist revolution to prevail: sign an aggression pact with the enemy in order to gain as much time as possible for war preparations. In other words, the soviets and nazis promised not to engage in war. And the former knew that the latter will inevitably break the pact; but again, the goal was to buy enough time to be able to fight off fascists.

If you don't want to understand the context and keep your eyes closed, then can you really claim to be antifascist? In you current state you're being nothing more than a parrot repeating the cold war era propaganda that your capitalist overlords keep feeding you. If you think otherwise, I advise you to not let your stubbornness come in the way when having a potentially fruitful conversation.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

If you don't want to understand the context and keep your eyes closed, then can you really claim to be antifascist? In you current state you're being nothing more than a parrot repeating the cold war era propaganda that your capitalist overlords keep feeding you.

The goddamned irony of this statement is palpable. I mean sure if it makes you feel better about what Stalin did, to say his hand was somehow forced to making a friendship agreement with the nazis and invade Poland, because his hands were tied, you go right on ahead.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Just like the USA support of Israel is a strategic move and not tacit approval of Gaza genocide, I guess.