this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

philosophy

20217 readers
2 users here now

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes

Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net
47
What do you think of panpsychism/the hard problem of consciousness? (hexbear.net)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by itsPina@hexbear.net to c/philosophy@hexbear.net
241 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Personally I think it's silly as hell. Qualia is obviously a biological component of experience... Not some weird thing that science will never be able to put in to words.

I've been listening to a lot of psychology podcasts lately and for some reason people seem obsessed with the idea despite you needing to make the same logical leaps to believe it as any sort of mysticism... Maybe I am just tripping idk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PowerLurker@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah this 100%, it's always the frustration i run into hearing hard (and imo reductive) physicalist/materialist arguments around this stuff. it almost always reads to me as coming from an ulterior motive of wanting to expand science beyond its purview, and/or of wanting to shortcut out the at times difficult cognitive dissonance that comes from the inherent ambiguity/mystery around philosophical questions.