this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
112 points (99.1% liked)

Manufacturing Consent

288 readers
235 users here now

When the media decides who you are rooting for.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I honestly don't see the issue in this headline. Should they remind everyone it's a fake ceasefire in every headline when that's absolutely apparent?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The idea seems to be that they are hiding that it's a ceasefire violation when they explicitly are reporting a ceasefire violation.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The idea seems to be that they are hiding that it’s a ceasefire violation when they explicitly are reporting a ceasefire violation.

This would make sense if they used the same 'objective' language for countries like Russia which are adversaries but they clearly don't. If Russia did something similar all the adjectives would be in the title. And NYT wouldn't be quoting Russia but Ukraine calling it a massive ceasefire violation.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Should they remind everyone it’s a fake ceasefire in every headline when that’s absolutely apparent?

This is literally the manufacturing consent community where shitty propaganda disguised as journalism is called out. Pretending it's a real ceasefire that was ever respected by Israel is part of the consent manufacturing.