this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

news

24526 readers
715 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 35 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

“Israel is doing a genocide. The most famous genocide was done by the nazis. So we combined the two symbols.”

Like what is there to defend? Whats left to explain? Fucking idiots.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 29 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

There's a widespread belief that the star of David is eternally a sacred untouchable symbol no matter what, and anyone who uses it in a negative or satirical context is automatically a nazi no matter how many times it's spray painted on the homes of murdered or ethnically cleansed Palestinians, or carved into their foreheads.

People like to make the comparison to the swastika to emphasize that religious symbols can be co-opted, but the swastika was not used as a symbol of genocide by Buddhists, or any other group for which it was a religious symbol. The star of David is used as a symbol of genocide by Jewish people. I don't think anyone should have to justify the association between the star of David and genocide, that association was created by Jewish people.

There's merit to the idea that it's better to avoid using the star of David to represent the zionist entity because it might reinforce the claim that the entity represents all Jews. There's no merit to the idea that associating the star of David with genocide makes you an antisemite, or that the star of David is somehow immune from association with genocide even though it's Jewish people who created that association in the first place (as I said above, unlike the swastika, which is still not immune from association with genocide).

Still, though this was no secret, we were instructed to treat it as such, sometimes by our parents, sometimes by well-meaning solidarity activists. We were instructed to ignore the Star of David on the Israeli flag, and to distinguish Jews from Zionists with surgical precision. It didn’t matter that their boots were on our necks, and that their bullets and batons bruised us. Our statelessness and homelessness were trivial. What mattered was how we spoke about our keepers, not the conditions they kept us under—blockaded, surrounded by colonies and military outposts—or the fact that they kept us at all.

What a burdensome impulse. Not only do we live in fear of displacement at the hands of a colonialism that professes itself as Jewish, not only are our people bombarded by an army that marches under what it claims is the Jewish flag, and not only do Israeli politicians over enunciate the Jewishness of their operations, we are told to disregard the Star of David soaring on their flag—the Star of David they carve into our skin.

https://mondoweiss.net/2023/09/jewish-settlers-stole-my-house-its-not-my-fault-theyre-jewish/

[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 21 points 4 weeks ago

The star historically was not considered a broad symbol representing all Jews. It was essentially created as such by the early Zionists.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 20 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I mean this is obvious to everyone with a brain. Any time someone claimed I was antisemitic because I didn’t want Israel to commit genocide I gave that claim absolutely zero weight. That rhetoric isn’t working, they should stop using it because it just makes them seem more evil.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 23 points 4 weeks ago

this but zionists should keep using it because it's actually really funny to watch them flush their credibility down the toilet.