this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
148 points (96.8% liked)
pics
25734 readers
1142 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's a really high quality photo for 2003. Most photographs from that time were early digital cameras and tended to max out about 720p resolution. It also doesn't look like a scanned photograph because there's no grain.
Canon Powershot cameras would have been the "standard" at the time, and had 3-4MP sensors in 2003 depending on price range.
The main issue with those early digicams was lacking dynamic range, so a sunny sky would almost always be glaring white.
But in this pic, that wouldn't show, since the dynamic range is very low.