this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
148 points (96.8% liked)

pics

25734 readers
1142 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a really high quality photo for 2003. Most photographs from that time were early digital cameras and tended to max out about 720p resolution. It also doesn't look like a scanned photograph because there's no grain.

[โ€“] mech@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Canon Powershot cameras would have been the "standard" at the time, and had 3-4MP sensors in 2003 depending on price range.
The main issue with those early digicams was lacking dynamic range, so a sunny sky would almost always be glaring white.
But in this pic, that wouldn't show, since the dynamic range is very low.